You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it is 4680 delays that are pushing CT. Tesla has no hope of meeting the price and performance claims without 4680s. I think Elon thought they were much closer to mass production of the 4680s than they were. As others have said, they will keep cranking out Ys while transitioning those to 4680s in order to prove out the tech, get an accurate handle on production costs, and then fire up CT.it looks like Tesla unveiled a very early prototype and then lost somehow interest / focus. We are now over 2yrs later and they still haven't figured out details like the wipers / door handles yes/ no and other items. Nor have we read the usual reports of large scale road-testing of prototypes in cold/ hot places.
maybe they start production in 2023 but i wouldn't expect them diverting resources to the CT in Austin while the high margin Model Y is selling like sliced bread.
As @Alset Srotom noted, that is 70k more than Tesla. Ford will crank out Lightning's as fast as they can get batteries. That is the only thing that could tip this in Elon's favor - vertically integrating battery production was genius. Everyone else is dependent on 3rd party suppliers (Technically Tesla is as well since Panasonic still makes the batteries, but under Tesla's roof with dedicated equipment and personnel).How many ford EV trucks do you guys truly believe will be delivered over next year?!? My guess is <20k. Following year, maybe another 50k. So good luck getting one of those as well.
Well it did changed since the prototype.
I'm talking about the look. Of course they will update the technology.Tesla doesn't deviate that far from prototypes.
So...I am considered an expert in manufacturing processes. Specifically, automotive. Building the line for a vehicle such as CT would not be difficult at all. Manufacturing is all about compartmentalization, where each build station is only responsible for a few components that take seconds to install.There seems to be 2 issues with the CT roll out (at least to me):
- they can't hit their stated price goals (or even close to it) as of now. Some of it may have to do with adding more tech to it, but overall, they seem to struggle getting the cost to where they want it to be.
- creating a whole new production line for a radically different (and I'm not talking about the shape) truck is going to take a long time. I wouldn't be surprised if it took a year (caveat: I know nothing about production).
So, seems to me that we'll be happy if they can get a truck out by mid 2023, but it may very well be 2024.
So 15 months from prototype to production?So...I am considered an expert in manufacturing processes. Specifically, automotive. Building the line for a vehicle such as CT would not be difficult at all. Manufacturing is all about compartmentalization, where each build station is only responsible for a few components that take seconds to install.
The real tell here is that we still don't even have a production ready prototype. The design & specs have to be finalized in order to define the bill of material of the vehicle and establish suppliers from the required raw material on up to the finished component.
This vehicle was unveiled in 2019. There should have been a final design & spec established no more than 3 mo's after that. Another 6 mo's and you should be doing bay builds (builds of multiple units in single bays prior to the line being fully established). This should be followed by another 6 mo's of testing to hash out any issues with new components. The production line should be developed as components are validated.
This is a classic case of wanting to announce a product without any intention of releasing it in the near future to build hype. If we see deliveries in 2023 I will be shocked.
I am guessing 25% of those reservation holders actually wind up buying.Reservations prove you wrong. Aside from the yoke, which I hope won't be the only option, there's nothing about the Cybertruck that isn't practical.
I have owned a couple Tacomas, great trucks. Toyota also enjoys some instant credibility when it comes to reliability. They would sell a ton of these.Seriously thinking of getting an EV tacoma if it looks like that and has good range.
Tesla isn't going to rush a product to market because of the "competition". They have too much demand for existing, already profitable products. As a customer I don't like the Cybertruck delay but for the company it probably makes the most sense. It will come out when Tesla thinks it's the right time for the product, which means they have optimized it as much as they think they can and have figured out how to make it profitably.I'm just glad that there are others coming to the scene and lighting the fire under everyone. Imagine if no R1T, F150 lighting, Hummer EV, Chevy, Ram, Tundra... CT would be a 2049 vehicle...
I still love my 2011 Taco, an EV version would be great. Don't know if I'd get one though because of the lack of fast charge stations, (no Supercharger network), and it won't be stainless steel.I have owned a couple Tacomas, great trucks. Toyota also enjoys some instant credibility when it comes to reliability. They would sell a ton of these.
It would work for me since I don't go on adventures. I would just charge it at home like our Tesla. Fast charging stations will become more commonplace over the next few years.I still love my 2011 Taco, an EV version would be great. Don't know if I'd get one though because of the lack of fast charge stations, (no Supercharger network), and it won't be stainless steel.
Completely agree and same here with owning tacomas. They are great!!!!I have owned a couple Tacomas, great trucks. Toyota also enjoys some instant credibility when it comes to reliability. They would sell a ton of these.
This is so ironic.I'm just glad that there are others coming to the scene and lighting the fire under everyone. Imagine if no R1T, F150 lighting, Hummer EV, Chevy, Ram, Tundra... CT would be a 2049 vehicle... Trucks are such a big market, there's no way that any of them aren't moving fast, I'm sure there are many constraints that us internet keyboard warriors don't see. We just want it and want it now!!
I doubt it. It seems like demand is higher than anticipated so they are investing heavily to ramp battery production as fast as they can. I think the traditional automakers could crank out these trucks pretty quick if they had batteries. Silverados/Sierras and F150s are their cash cows so they are must wins for both GM and Ford. They also have to be smart about it. They have to manage the pace of transition from ICE to EV and not alienate their existing customer base.I wonder if Ford and Chevy are going to take it easy for a bit knowing the Cybertruck is on hold.
True, but I think both companies are going to struggle to release trucks which are remotely affordable and profitable. There isn’t a ton of incentive to release 1000s of trucks when you are making a fraction of what they’d make selling them ICE or hybrid.I doubt it. It seems like demand is higher than anticipated so they are investing heavily to ramp battery production as fast as they can. I think the traditional automakers could crank out these trucks pretty quick if they had batteries. Silverados/Sierras and F150s are their cash cows so they are must wins for both GM and Ford. They also have to be smart about it. They have to manage the pace of transition from ICE to EV and not alienate their existing customer base.
What GM's $7 Billion Investment Means for the 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV
GM's announcement that its is investing $7 billion into its EV production means great news for drivers who are anxious to land a 2024 Chevy Silverado EV or a 2024 GMC Sierra EV. Here's how the automaker plans to boost production.www.torquenews.com
Yeah, this is the tough part of having to transition the business. $100k Hummers and Silverados for a while or low supply of the more affordable models.True, but I think both companies are going to struggle to release trucks which are remotely affordable and profitable. There isn’t a ton of incentive to release 1000s of trucks when you are making a fraction of what they’d make selling them ICE or hybrid.
Bollinger gave up on their B1 and B2 trucks recently, deciding instead to work on rolling chassis for larger commercial delivery trucks.It’s unlikely anyone other than Rivian and Bollinger would be focused on trucks right now if the Cybertruck hadn’t been announced.
Yeah. But when the Cybertruck launched, it was one of the few electric trucks out there with plans in motion. Ford and GM didn’t announce anything until Tesla got into the truck game.Bollinger gave up on their B1 and B2 trucks recently, deciding instead to work on rolling chassis for larger commercial delivery trucks.
No, longer. There is a ton of time and work from conception to unveil. 36-48 mo's is typical including all of the prelim work. Designing the vehicle and doing the initial spec is the most time consuming.So 15 months from prototype to production?