AnxietyRanger
Well-Known Member
Seeking a compromise on size: I would probably consider if Smart ED, like Renault Twingo, was too small for teenagers. The likelihood of a crash is much higher in that stage of car ownership and with small cars crumple zones are naturally less, the Smart of course being an extreme example. I like Smart as a car, but just to go with my "sufficient size" point, I think a size class or two upwards, the safety for occupants and safety for bystanders ratio could be more optimal.
I do get the point of a single passenger, that is a valid point. And safety ratings mean size isn't everything. One more point, though: experience with microcars in Europe (also limited to two) has shown teenagers tend to pack an extra passenger (sometimes even more than that) illegally in the tiny trunk and the front passenger seat. That may be even more dangerous, if the driver doesn't have sufficient space to operate the vehicle, and of course is dangerous in the event of a crash for occupants because there aren't enough seatbelts for all. Kids can be resourceful at times.
So, it is of course a multi-faceted issue and any decisions must be made based on what makes sense for the individual situation.
I do get the point of a single passenger, that is a valid point. And safety ratings mean size isn't everything. One more point, though: experience with microcars in Europe (also limited to two) has shown teenagers tend to pack an extra passenger (sometimes even more than that) illegally in the tiny trunk and the front passenger seat. That may be even more dangerous, if the driver doesn't have sufficient space to operate the vehicle, and of course is dangerous in the event of a crash for occupants because there aren't enough seatbelts for all. Kids can be resourceful at times.
So, it is of course a multi-faceted issue and any decisions must be made based on what makes sense for the individual situation.