erthquake
Active Member
The kind of evidence of wrongdoing to justify the removal of Trump from office has not surfaced yet. Keep an eye on the news and please share with us in the more frequently read threads if you hear of solid evidence coming forward. Only then will I join you in expecting such a dip. Is such evidence possible? Of course. Is it almost certain? No way. Telling Comey that he ought to go easy on Flynn because he's a good man is simply not enough. Ditto with firing Comey. The man was way too political to make a good head of the FBI. Let's both be objective in looking at this issue.
Here's my thought process:
* In order for Trump to be motivated to cover up a crime of plotting with the Russians to disrupt the election, he first would have to know of such a crime.
* If Trump knew of such a crime, the Russians could easily blackmail or expose him because they know about it too. What we're seeing from Trump, though, are actions that tend to antagonize the Russians: U.S. bombing of troops in Syria that are allied with Russia, bolstering Arab resolve against Iran, promoting growth of the U.S. oil sector, which will hurt Russian exports, etc.
* Therefore, since Trump is antagonizing the people who could blackmail or expose him, they probably would release damaging info if it existed, but we see no evidence of it.
* Finally, why would Russia prefer Trump over Clinton? Trump's rhetoric towards Putin was somewhat disarming, but other than that Trump is perceived as more of a hard-liner in trade issues, in bolstering strong allies who typically oppose the Russians, and in encouraging significant growth of U.S. oil production. The Russians would have to be nuts to prefer him to Hillary.
It's widely known that Putin hates Hillary Clinton. She is/was a very anti-Putin hawk. It's coming out now that Russia was trying to influence Trump's advisors, the ones that he listens to for hit rhetoric. Trump's dealings with Syria, Arab sentiment, and US oil, are a minor irritant to Russia. However, Trump's attempts, intentional or not, to erode and weaken NATO are much more significant and a net benefit to Russia.
That said, I've seen numerous experts (full disclosure, mostly on CNN) who say that forcibly removing Trump via impeachment would be very difficult unless something truly egregious comes to light. I now think it's most likely that Trump will remain in office for his full term, but he and the Republicans will accomplish little. At the moment, the most likely scenario for Trump leaving early is if the Republicans completely turn their backs on him, and he gets fed up, takes his ball and goes home, so to speak. This is still less likely than Trump finishing his term.