You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do we know the rise around 1:30 was a long vs short covering?
I agree with this 100%. I guess my question is more about specific tactics used my traders to push the SP up.As I have posted before. This is not just a 'short issue'...it is a 'long issue' as well. If there were long buyers opt longs refusing to sell at certain SPs there would be less of the 'shorts are controlling the SP' posts.
Many longs, myself included, are sitting with cash on the sidelines waiting for a sign that the 'trend is your friend' is turning.
We always talk about shorts manipulating the stock via various tactics (i.e. mandatory morning dip, capping, dip on steroids, whack a mole, etc.). Why are there no bullish traders equally as enthusiastic as the shorts applying techniques to bump up the SP? Maybe there are, but I've yet to see it discussed anywhere. All that typically gets mentioned is institutional or MM buying.
I tend to agree with Neroden that the manipulations only work in the short(ish) term. The shorts put a lot of energy into manipulating the stock down to 180 last November (using the fear of the SCTY merger to their advantage) and since then it has been above 380, twice. The farther it is driven down, the farther and faster it rises. For the most part, many shorts are short-termers. These people who control 20ish% of the stock account for 40% of the trades.
That said, you do see manipulations by longs or market-makers as we approach certain Friday afternoons... efforts to get the stock price above or below a certain strike price because they're holding or (more likely) they have sold lots of options. When some long (perhaps with the help of algos) sent TSLA up into the green today at 1:30 pm today, I thought, "this is ballsy but very cool." I think the shorts were absolutely stunned for a few minutes, so yes, it would be possible for a long to start the ball rolling at critical times such as this afternoon, but unless other longs jump in to assist, the effort is not likely to succeed. One reason other longs didn't support the run up was that the shorts (after changing their shorts) went to work within a couple minutes capping the rally and then slowly marching it back down. Longs don't have a swat team standing by to act, as the shorts have. To succeed with manipulations, you need a culture that supports manipulations, and the shorts have that culture right now.
To answer your question: This sort of manipulation (large block orders vs. dribbling orders out to control whether the price reacts or not) only works in the very short term. How many Tesla longs are really thinking short-term?
Not many, I guess.
When will that change? When will the real short-term momo traders move in? Maybe early next year?
The Australia news will all hit before market open tomorrow, because of the date line.