You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIDAR doesn't do anything especially impressive either, I tend to believe Musk is on the right pat in spite of what everyone else is saying. That having been said, my experience with LIDAR is fairly limited, so it could be that I've only dealt with poor implementations.
I wonder if the big 3 (and maybe others) pushed for the SAE to include LIDAR in their FSD standard as a barrier of entry. It wouldn't be that hard to believe, really. Just like it's not that hard to believe that the big three sponsor at least some lobbying to force electric vehicles to make sound for "safety."
LIDAR is VERY impressive. Currently just too bulky and expensive but it is superior to Tesla system currently. Tesla's advantage is cost and size.
May be related to some state laws that require headlights on when using wipers. My 2015 produced Volt turns on lights after 15 seconds of wipers. I’m in MA and they added this law about a year ago.I find it also interesting that the headlights turn on in the first video, and are already on in the second. Is this just an auto feature of the wipers coming on? Also, the Road surface around the centerline looks very un-standard.
Lidar does not work well in rain or fog, so it does not cover all cases either, despite being ugly and expensive to add to cars.I'm a broken record on this, but I feel the Lidar issue is not going to go away.
Would the car be better or worse if it had Lidar?
If the answer is better, then it seems like a necessity.
I disagree (but don’t want to hit disagree lest you think I’m angry) if hills and crests can be solved, so can this.They can do all of the software updates possible... is this not disconcerting when Tesla says the vehicles have all the hardware necessary for fully autonomous self driving?
I'm a broken record on this, but I feel the Lidar issue is not going to go away.
Would the car be better or worse if it had Lidar?
If the answer is better, then it seems like a necessity.
They can do all of the software updates possible... is this not disconcerting when Tesla says the vehicles have all the hardware necessary for fully autonomous self driving?
I'm a broken record on this, but I feel the Lidar issue is not going to go away.
Would the car be better or worse if it had Lidar?
If the answer is better, then it seems like a necessity.
Why would Lidar help in this case? The only advantage of Lidar is its ability to provide distance information - this might help to detect object on or near the road but I can't see how that information helps you to find the center of a lane.
The information of precise distance of every point around you is mostly noise. For self-driving I don’t think it provides anything in principle that can’t be achieved with stereo cameras. The key is really AI vision – if you have it then it doesn’t matter if the data is provided by camera or Lidar, and if you don’t have it then you have to hard-code algorithms to handle various conditions – in these cases Lidar data might be easier to use because it gives you distance directly, but long term hard-coded algorithms is a dead end so at the end Lidar doesn't really buy you much.
I am not an expert on self-driving, but my guess is that there are two problems to solve here: 1. recognizing various objects/elements (lane, sign, people, car, etc.) and their positions/speeds/accelerations, etc. 2. Deciding how to drive once given a set of such elements/objects. The first problem probably can be solved pretty efficiently by neuro nets and my guess is that current 2.0/2.5 hardware is sufficient. The second problem I think can be more efficiently solved by rule based systems (with a relatively small set of rules) than neuro nets so the current hardware should be able to handle as well. Rule based system probably will not be able to cover all corner cases so it might not be sufficient for L5 but I feel that it should be able to cover enough cases for L2-4.Problem is how much patience does the public have with AI vision
and
do we have the hardware to execute AI FSD as is on the 2.0/2.5 platform..