I'm starting to think if you can believe in God, then it's just as possible to believe in anything, like how we are living in a simulation. I find this article on the subject intriguing:
Are You Living in a Simulation?
This "God" is merely a higher being that created our world for testing purposes. So the "God" in the Bible could be one that we have made up own our own. This chunk of the article might be hard to follow without reading from the beginning, but here it is:
Are You Living in a Simulation?
This "God" is merely a higher being that created our world for testing purposes. So the "God" in the Bible could be one that we have made up own our own. This chunk of the article might be hard to follow without reading from the beginning, but here it is:
Although all the elements of such a system can be naturalistic, even physical, it is possible to draw some loose analogies with religious conceptions of the world. In some ways, the posthumans running a simulation are like gods in relation to the people inhabiting the simulation: the posthumans created the world we see; they are of superior intelligence; they are “omnipotent” in the sense that they can interfere in the workings of our world even in ways that violate its physical laws; and they are “omniscient” in the sense that they can monitor everything that happens. However, all the demigods except those at the fundamental level of reality are subject to sanctions by the more powerful gods living at lower levels.
Further rumination on these themes could climax in a naturalistic theogony that would study the structure of this hierarchy, and the constraints imposed on its inhabitants by the possibility that their actions on their own level may affect the treatment they receive from dwellers of deeper levels. For example, if nobody can be sure that they are at the basement-level, then everybody would have to consider the possibility that their actions will be rewarded or punished, based perhaps on moral criteria, by their simulators. An afterlife would be a real possibility. Because of this fundamental uncertainty, even the basement civilization may have a reason to behave ethically. The fact that it has such a reason for moral behavior would of course add to everybody else’s reason for behaving morally, and so on, in truly virtuous circle. One might get a kind of universal ethical imperative, which it would be in everybody’s self-interest to obey, as it were “from nowhere”.