Zhelko Dimic
Careful bull
For Model 3, it has to be either $4k or $3.5k to be more similar to the up-charges for consumer level AWD from other vendors. And at the consumer level, I have to wonder why they are ignoring FWD Model 3 (Front wheel drive). Anywhere that has winter climates or heavy rains often, I'd rather be in a FWD car than RWD.
Is this serious question? There are no cars that are both FWD and RWD.
AWD is either RWD or FWD based, it's rare that cars are truly AWD. Some that are built only as AWD like Audi R8, are still pre-dominantly RWD, as a driver's choice.
FWD is usually considered pedestrian choice and sport sedans are RWD.
RWD allows separation of responsibility, front tires steer, rear tires provide push. With FWD, you're asking tires in the front to do all the work, and rear wheels are there only so body doesn't drag on the asphalt.
BTW, I do agree that FWD is inherently better for the snow than RWD, but with modern electronics and snow tires, that's rarely a concern. I've driven RWDs for years in Canada through winters, and my wife has too, whether she knew it or now...