You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the practical purpose, that's a yes since there's no more obstacle.Musk owns Twitter now?
It's now just the formality. Currently, the price is $51.63 so which shareholders would not vote to sell theirs at $54.20?
Indeed. The question would be whether there are enough activists who would vote for the moral value rather than for the short-term profit.Shareholders that don't want Elon to be the Twitter technoking.
My wife is considering buying stock just to vote "no"
Didn't the board make a "poison pill"? Wonder what happened that changed things.Indeed. The question would be whether there are enough activists who would vote for the moral value rather than for the short-term profit.
Remember, in the beginning, the board was resisting the short-term profit and wanted to go for the moral value.
However, due to shareholders' greed pressure, the board has now given in.
W/o Musk, the craptastic earnings coming up, the SP value would tank to the 30s where it should be. Then Musk could do a hostile takeover and get it even cheaper. The board accepted the offer... some say they did it to avoid the earnings exposure lmao.Shareholders that don't want Elon to be the Twitter technoking.
My wife is considering buying stock just to vote "no"
Exactly! The resistance was ready. The board just needed encouragement from activists to implement the resistance but I guess without the activists' lead, as the Borg said "Resistance is futile!"Didn't the board make a "poison pill"? Wonder what happened that changed things.
There's no more obstacles from the board of directors so it should be an easy yes.Musk owns Twitter now?
There's a pension fund that's suing to block the sale:There's no more obstacles from the board of directors so it should be an easy yes.
However, the obstacle now seems to come from Elon Musk himself.
When he now just promised to bring Trump back, he gave a cryptic disclosure:
"So this is not a thing that will definitely happen because what if I don’t own Twitter.”
Read: "...what if I don’t own Twitter.”
The stock price immediately closed further down to $47.26!
Thanks for the info. Very interesting!I don't think it's all on Elon...
I don't think it's all on Elon.
I guess there are multiple obstacles, but the gist I'm getting from this whole 5% thing is Elon trying to back out of the deal (as there wasn't indication he was overly concerned about that previously, after all, the whole rationale for taking it over is to improve the company, including addressing spam accounts). The negative impact on Tesla's stock is fairly obvious, and it seems people in Twitter are not supportive either.The Board of Directors were planning a poison pill and looks like it's now given to them to exercise as needed: Refusing to publicly prove that spam is less than 5% would save the company from being taken over: