You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Plus it will run the same times as long as there is gas in the tank. No degradation in performance based on the state of charge analog for a fuel tank...
Car and Driver tested three cars last year (a Ferrari, a Toyota SUV and a Hellcat) in a comparison of how quickly they could run the tanks empty and found that the Hellcat actually had very consistent times between a full tank and an empty tank (well, right before it hit empty).Actually... you get a better run time (theoretically at least) when your ICE is low on it's energy storage; just the opposite of our cars.
There's a couple things like that which I find interesting between EV & ICE that are polar opposites.
Warm Day - EV Advantage
Cool Day - ICE Advantage
High 'Fuel' - EV Advantage
Low 'Fuel' - ICE Advantage
And others I can't think of right now... interesting though!
Remove the carpeting from the frunk...P100D is no longer the fastest production vehicle.
The Dodge Demon is an 840-horsepower manifesto
I wonder what Elon's response to this will be.
I'll believe it's a 10 sec car running 1/4 mile time but i willing to bet the casual driver will never see 0-60 in under 3 sec
That's pretty interesting... The Hellcat has an 18.5 gallon tank. That's approximately 115 pounds of fuel. If they had consistent times from full to empty, the driver must not have ever been able to successfully achieve the max potential of the car. Or the car is incapable of achieving it's potential by design. In any case, still really interesting.Car and Driver tested three cars last year (a Ferrari, a Toyota SUV and a Hellcat) in a comparison of how quickly they could run the tanks empty and found that the Hellcat actually had very consistent times between a full tank and an empty tank (well, right before it hit empty).
P100D is no longer the fastest production vehicle.
The Dodge Demon is an 840-horsepower manifesto
I wonder what Elon's response to this will be.
maybe because the Motor Trend time is a bit useless...it's a 0-60 mph time (in other words about 80 foot run) where they give the car a 1 foot rollout before the clocks start.Dodge's website clearly states it's the fastest 0-60 and fastest production car and ignores MT time of 2.27xxxx. Let the name calling between the two continue. It's also the first production car to wheelie. Where is the video?
Tesla likes to label the flagship P100D as the fastest accelerating but the Demon under hard acceleration pulls 1.8G. Headaches galore! I do wonder if those tires are all 50 state legal and if higher octane fuel was used to run a 9.6 1/4. Anytime you're in the mid 10's is a super car. A mid 9 sec car is unthinkable. Price is probably low six figures.
With a 200lb suited driver it's 4400lb car IIRC. 115lb isn't a big deal, especially if it helps with traction. And you can't run empty usually, the g's at launch push the fuel back at first, then bounces forward uncovering the pickup.That's pretty interesting... The Hellcat has an 18.5 gallon tank. That's approximately 115 pounds of fuel. If they had consistent times from full to empty, the driver must not have ever been able to successfully achieve the max potential of the car. Or the car is incapable of achieving it's potential by design. In any case, still really interesting.
can undoutbedly go much farther on a tank than a P100DL can on a full battery when it's in ludicrous mode and accelerating hard constantly.I don't see MPG ratings...
maybe because the Motor Trend time is a bit useless...it's a 0-60 mph time (in other words about 80 foot run) where they give the car a 1 foot rollout before the clocks start.
Why? because that's how the timers work at a dragstrip they say...but that's completely irrelevant for measuring any other acceleration.
That's why manufacturer claimed times are almost always slower than 'motor trend' or whomever uses a 1 foot rollout.
Giving the car a 1 foot headstart on an 80 foot race is kinda stupid.
not to ruin the anti-dodge party but no, you won't. Tracks will make exceptions for a 'supercar' status vehicle if it is all stock. They may ask you to wear a helmet and a jacket but that's it.Not to dash anybody's hopes, but I have a hunch that you'll need a NHRA Super Gas license (check), firesuit and SNELL SA helmet (check), have the car caged and NHRA certified, fire system, and run a chute (ugh, talk about ruining your resale value).
Never in my wildest dreams did I ever think an automaker would plate a 9 second drag car and make emissions.
It would not be the quickest thing I've raced, but it would be the quickest thing that's actually 100% street legal.
No, I think it just weighs a lot, and makes a ton of power.That's pretty interesting... The Hellcat has an 18.5 gallon tank. That's approximately 115 pounds of fuel. If they had consistent times from full to empty, the driver must not have ever been able to successfully achieve the max potential of the car. Or the car is incapable of achieving it's potential by design. In any case, still really interesting.
not to ruin the anti-dodge party but no, you won't. Tracks will make exceptions for a 'supercar' status vehicle if it is all stock. They may ask you to wear a helmet and a jacket but that's it.
Chevy measures performance times based on initial car movement, it printed the specs. Dragstrips I go to do not know or care about 0-60mph times. Nobody races to 60 I suppose except barstools and lawnmowers.
Ok, I watched the video release...
"Johnny hits .340 on home games against the Cubs."
This is when I knew they jumped the shark, nobody hits .340 against the Cubs pitching...
RT