If it's a limited "production" run, it's not really a production car. It's a small volume custom car. 3000 vehicles is not production in the real world. Yes, it qualifies under legal guidelines, but no sane person considers 3000 cars a production car.
It's an option package for a Challenger. But 500 units is considered 'production' for many race organizations.
No doubt... but what I'm saying is that if you have a limited production run vehicle, it's not really a production car. It's a custom built, purpose car, not a production car. A production car is something you go buy in a showroom and there are thousands just like them.
LOL, that is clever marketing speak for "it does not meet the published NHRA safety requirements requiring cars faster than 9.99 to have a roll cage". Describing that as "banned for being too fast" is clickbait.
I'm not saying the roll bar / roll cage rules make sense now that unaltered street cars can run 9s and 10s, but they are what they are and anyone buying a Demon is going to have to figure out whether they'll be allowed on their local drag strip.
That's a very naive thing to say. It's clearly a magnificent car.
Honestly, that is just dumb.I suppose it would have been magnificent 20 years ago when the antiquated use of "Guzzolene" was all the rage. It's going to take the path of the Hummer...a failed project of the fossil fuel age. Oh, and Chrysler won't exist in 5 years if they think a gas guzzling "super car" is the answer to their problems. On a positive note the name is pretty cool.![]()
*cough* GT3RS *cough* *cough*The drag radials are street legal, early in the thread some said that the car was not on street legal tires.
A roll cage in a street car where you're not wearing a helmet, could be downright dangerous.
This is probably the reason why they didn't put a roll cage in it. It would have met the NHRA safety requirements, but at the same time could have increased the risk of head injury on the street.
As it stands, anyone buying one of these cars is likely to have a hell of a time getting it insured. This car is essentially a purpose built race car.
As long as the owner's Demon stays at 9.99 or slower, then it can run on NHRA tracks without a cage.
*cough* GT3RS *cough* *cough*
I'm guessing you're a tech guy and not a car guy, because if you can't understand what a monumental achievement the Demon is, running a a 9.X with a factory warranty and full creature comforts, perhaps coming into a thread and criticising it isn't the best course of action. It makes you look dumb.How do you mean?
I suppose it would have been magnificent 20 years ago when the antiquated use of "Guzzolene" was all the rage. It's going to take the path of the Hummer...a failed project of the fossil fuel age. Oh, and Chrysler won't exist in 5 years if they think a gas guzzling "super car" is the answer to their problems. On a positive note the name is pretty cool.![]()
I'm guessing you're a tech guy and not a car guy, because if you can't understand what a monumental achievement the Demon is, running a a 9.X with a factory warranty and full creature comforts, perhaps coming into a thread and criticising it isn't the best course of action. It makes you look dumb.
No, I assume people are intelligent here and can appreciate things like this Demon for what they are. This car is much faster than a P100D and costs much less. It is essentially the apex of what a muscle car can be. I appreciate cars regardless of their propulsion system, from the Diesel/Electric Turbo Audi SQ7 to the N/A Lamborghini Huracan, to the turbo monster that is a Chiron. They all have their place. Dismissing them because they aren't electric IS stupid.But don't you think fawning over a gas guzzling beast being produced by an antiquated car company as a last gasp attempt at relevancy on a Tesla forum and not expecting backlash could be considered, as you put it, "dumb"?
No, I assume people are intelligent here and can appreciate things like this Demon for what they are. This car is much faster than a P100D and costs much less.
That's a very interesting statement, considering that no article I've seen includes a price, and some of them explicitly say that Dodge refused to tell them the price...
Also, what I think you meant is that it is much quicker in a single set of carefully controlled conditions - one which it is actually banned from participating in because they breached the ten second line and don't have the equipment required for the faster class (according to Dodge's own video.) How's that for ironic?
The available data suggests it won't beat the P100DL to 60 even in the Demon's ideal environment, and it certainly won't be quicker in typical street situations.
They stated at the launch it would be under $100k.
The car runs a 9 quarter mile. It is faster than a P100D by a significant margin. Im sure the P100D is faster 0-10,20,30,40,50 and maybe even 60, but if you ask which car is faster fullstop? The Demon is a faster car. Undoubtably.
The 'banned by the NHRA' is just a marketing thing. You can still take this car to the track. If you want to fit the skinny wheels, then yes, you'll need a cage/chute. But very few people will do this. The Mclaren P1 and Porsche 918 also run in the 9's. I don't see a big woohaa about them being banned from the strip.
I highly doubt that. The Demon will still run sticky tires on the road, and it will still have 840hp, which is substantially more than the P100D. But let's not get into a top trumps, these are both great cars. The Demon deserves respect, which is more than the fanboys in this thread are giving it.Probably because their manufacturers didn't boast about being banned from the only place that they are good for anything.
The part you seem to be consistently ignoring is that the Dodge relies on driveline inertia, super sticky tires and a prepared surface for its performance - which means that the P100DL will be substantially faster anywhere except on a drag strip.