The problem here seems to be that tesla-screen has been written by someone in the USA without regard for the different way the info is displayed in EU-market cars.
For what is displayed beside the speedo (if you choose miles rather than percent), USA cars have two options: "Rated" and "Ideal". Rated is the EPA official test, which is mildly optimistic yet achievable in real-life use under favourable conditions; "Ideal" is based on constant 50mph and so is hugely optimistic for any real driving.
EU cars also have two options, but they are both different from the USA ones: "Typical" and "Rated". "Typical" is a figure invented by Tesla and seems to be roughly based on constant 70mph driving; it's slightly less optimistic (ie. smaller figure) than the USA-Rated and reasonably easy to achieve in real life (though not with a lead foot). "Rated" for EU cars is currently based on the ludicrously optimistic NEDC official test - this is closer to the USA "ideal" than to the USA "rated".
So you can't compare any of the numbers from your car with those reported by cars in the USA, and tesla-screen is confusing you by labelling your numbers as if they came from a USA-spec car.
Most UK drivers prefer to have their displays set to "Typical" rather than "Ideal" since Typical is at least potentially achievable. Some people prefer just the percentage rather than miles; I don't know anybody who likes "ideal", other than people trying to sell the cars and make them look good.
All the above are based on the car's estimate of the energy available in the battery, and then converting to miles based on a (choice of) fixed assumptions of driving pattern. There is also the "estimated range", tucked away on the energy screen in the car's display, which estimates the range which would be achieved if you continued driving in the same conditions as the past 5, 15 or 30 miles. This sounds useful, and indeed many EVs display that as their main 'fuel gauge' figure, but experience shows it to be almost useless (Leaf drivers refer to the "Guessometer"). It's quite easy to take a Tesla-style standardised range and say, "OK, today it's raining so it will be a bit worse", or "I'm driving on slow A-roads so can maybe do better"; it's much more difficult to remember what you were doing on the past 30 miles, which could be a couple of short trips and so quite unrepresentative of what is coming up next.