Might want to have that looked at - especially if one of the early 90 packs. There are numerous 100Kers who don’t have 10% degradation.
Anecdotally, I met one fellow a couple years ago at a northern WA SC who SCd daily during the week due to his sales territory requirements - and that was on top of leaving each morning w a full charge. His house was completely powered by solar as an aside. Anyway, he was at 91K miles and didn’t have 10% degradation.
So... no harm in having it looked at. Sounds like you’re due a new pack, and the later 90 packs are much better. Kinda like the old DUs. Once you got to a Q series one, all was good.
Mine is an S60 and Tesla service says my battery pack checks out fine remotely. They suggested that the problem was my charging regimen (not charging to 90%
all the time leads the BMS to give false readings) but when I changed it I saw only a slight improvement, so I don't buy that explanation. I don't like to charge to 90% all the time because it means reduced regen when descending steep — up to 14% grade — mountain hairpin turns, something I do every time I leave home.
My hypothesis is that I have to work the pack in my S60
much harder (charge higher, drive lower, lots more cycles) than those with 85s (or 90s and 100s). I also live in the mountains which means higher kW use just in normal driving, a possible factor. Since most of my miles are via Supercharger that also seems a possible factor in degradation. (You've done more road trip miles than I have, how many times have you had to Supercharge to 95% and drive to <5% just to make a trip leg?)
Regardless, I just live with the reduced range — although it makes some trip legs more difficult.
Yes, I had a Q revision rebuilt DU replacement in October — what a difference, it sounds/feels like a new car! A new battery pack would be nice but Tesla doesn't seem inclined to do it.