I do not think that Tesla discloses its Supercharger revenues (immaterial) or costs (also immaterial) with perhaps excepting the fixed asset costs with building out new or expanded locations as a part of their capital expenditures each reporting period.
Here in the good ole US of A, utilities bill commercial and industrial customers not only for the electricity delivered but also for "demand charges." These demand charges take the highest electricity draw in kilowatts for any 10 or 15 minute period during the billing cycle and multiplies that amount by anywhere from $10-$30 per kW. A ten-stall station could be sucking 600+kW at one moment in time. I do not believe that domestic utilities offer quantity discounts.
Then, we need to factor in all the period costs with maintaining and repairing these locations. Cables wear out. Stalls are damaged. The charger stack and electronics poop out. The distances that need to be covered by the technicians can be hundreds, if not thousands of miles. Those labor costs are not cheap.
This is my opinion, but I would be surprised that even with the advent of paid Supercharging that five years down the road, Tesla even covers half the operating costs (forget depreciation; just cash outlay) of their Supercharger network.