Wow, there is a bunch of confusion here.
There are lies, damn lies, and finally EA DCFC maps.
Not sure what that specifically means. The maps are accurate in that the sites do exist at those locations. Does EA still have reliability problems? Yes. But I’ve charged at several dozen EA sites in the western US (many of them on multiple occasions at different times of the year) on many road trips and I’ve only failed to get a charge and had to stay overnight at a hotel unexpectedly once. I have had failures with one or two stalls and had to switch to get a charge on way too many occasions.
Go to the EA quarterly report and pull up the average number of charging stations per site. And follow that up with the usage statistics. Hint: EA chargers in middle America are covered with cobwebs. And it ain't a Halloween decoration
The same was true of many 4-stall Supercharger sites in middle America back in the day when there were many fewer Tesla cars on the road. This will change quickly as more car models from more makers hit the market in the next 2-3 years. Not having to fight over charging stalls right now is a good thing.
....As far as I know there are very few vehicles available that can use even 200kW on the EA chargers. (Is the Taycan the only one?)
I think Taycan is the only one right now but the Audi e-tron GT is happening soon and that is based on the 800V Taycan powertrain (I think offhand). I’m pretty sure Lucid is 800V. Rivian was originally 400V but that could have changed recently... I’m not sure. I assume there will soon be multiple high-end 800V models with larger batteries charging at 200 kW or more.
The only cars that can break 200 kW on EA chargers are the 800V cars, on the single 350 kW/1000V rated stall EA installs at each site.
Ironically, if that stall isn't available or isn't working, they charge slower than other cars, having to use an onboard transformer to get battery voltage from the 500V max of the other stalls. Taycan has a 50 kW transformer standard; a 150 kW version is optional.
EA does not have any single stall 350 kW sites, as far as I know. Essentially all of their highway sites have two 350 kW stalls. Some of these sites are urban locations. All EA rural locations have two 350 kW stalls and at least two additional 150 kW stalls.
Essentially all newer-generation chargers support up to at least 920V and that certainly includes all EA chargers — even their 50 kW stalls (except for the small number of EVgo-hosted units that EA paid for very early on).
So, the Taycan charges at the peak power output on 50 kW or 150 kW EA stalls. The Taycan’s onboard DC voltage booster is only used when charging on older-generation chargers that almost universally support a peak of 50 kW (a tiny number support 100 kW but none in North America as far as I know).
I wrote about this here:
Should Porsche Taycan buyers pay for the 150 kW “DC charger” option?
Even here in the SF Bay Area, EA utilization looks very low. Every time I've been to or driven by an EA charger, either I'm the only user or there is nobody there. The only exception is when I went to meet w/a Taycan driver at an EA charger. He's a Bolt driver who recently got a Taycan.
Before meeting him, I had done some digging and realized that Taycans (Porsche being owned by VW and EA being owned by VW of America) get 3 years of free EA charging (30 minute DC FC sessions at a time w/1 hour timeout in between) as long as the EA session is started from Porsche's app. That explains why I'd been seeing numerous Taycan checkins on Plugshare at EA sites in the past few months.
Also, they get discounted charging (25 cents a minute in CA) once they pass the 30 minute free charging.
Also, he mentioned that most of the EA chargers in my city are only 150 kW. He had to go to Gilroy to use a 350 kW unit.
EA has similar manufacturer pre-paid charging plans with other car makers and I assume more will be done in the future. For example, Ford includes a limited amount of “free” DC charging at EA with each Mach-e.
Of the 30-something operational EA sites around the SF Bay Area, the Novato and Livermore locations also support 350 kW. The vast majority are 150 kW and a few are 50 kW locations.
If you go to
Porsche Taycan 4S - Porsche USA and pick the cheapest Taycan then build, under E-Mobility, there's a $460 option called "On-Board 150 kW/400V DC Charger". If you click on the i, it says "Optional On-Board DC Charger to increase maximum charging capacity when charging at public 400V direct current charging stations. By increasing the charging capacity to 150kW, the charging time is decreased."
Except that are basically no chargers that are limited to 500V but can supply 150 kW. They simply don’t exist. There are a tiny number of such chargers installed in Europe and that’s about it. That option is waste of money.
Yes, it looks like it when looking at the label on EA BTC Power charger in my area. Would be interesting to know if the car still limits itself to 50 kW anyway w/o paying for that $460 upgrade.
Nope, there are no artificial limitations on the Taycan.
That just means that the dispenser has the cooled cable and it will not be the limiting factor. The cabinet connected to the dispenser would be the limiting factor and I suspect that EA paired a 150kW cabinet with only one dispenser.
Personally, I think that in an urban area, it would be more interesting to pair two dispensers with the cooled cables with a 200kW cabinet that can split the power between the stalls. In that case a single Taycan could take 200kW or two e-Trons could take 100kW each. BTC explicitly supports this configuration.
EA does not implement power splitting even though BTC and perhaps other equipment theoretically supports it. Tesla is moving away from power splitting as well. It’s urban 72 kW stalls and I’m pretty sure it’s 250 kW V3 stalls (oops, I was wrong about V3) all have dedicated charging cabinets up to their full capability.