Why do you continue to use predictions from before the MobilEye split???
Post July 2016, your data shows:
March 2017: about 2019
November 2018: about 2019
Jan 2019: about the end of 2019
Feb 2019: probably 2019, sleep in it around 2020
April 2019: likely better than human this year, deffinatly next year.
What does mobileye has to do with this? Tesla started development on their "Tesla Vision" late 2015 and hired Jim Keller Jan 2016. The chip guru who built Apple’s Ax microprocessors joins Tesla to lead the Autopilot Hardware Engineering team
None of Elon's prediction have anything to do with mobileye. Elon said he will have Level 5 autonomous cars in Q4 2017, mobileye's EyeQ4 (which doesn't support level 5 perception) wouldn't be ready until Q4 2017. Their perception system for Level 5 EyeQ5 wouldn't be ready till Q1 2020.
Yet mobileye is supposed to be responsible for elon not being able to deliver a Level 5 system in Q4 2017?
Did mobileye also stop Elon from demoing cross country by end of 2017? what about reaching AP1 parity by before Dec 2016? or EAP being ready Dec 2016? Or FSD 3 months maybe or 6 months definitely?
October 19th 2016 said:Tesla hopes its ghost in the machine will be fully ready by the end of next year, and the proof will be a cross country road trip. Musk said he could have a Tesla pick someone up from their home in LA and drop them off in the bright lights of Times Square, New York—then park itself. “It will do this without the need for a single touch, including the charger,” says Musk.
You Tesla fans have completely lost all credibility.
Um, yes it does (L3). And your own post (quoted above) states that he said maybe for this year and he'd be shocked if not next year regarding drivers making things less safe. So who is twisting things?
Yes he said maybe this year Tesla will be Level 5. which i have stated.
L2 requires driver attention and continuous monitoring, so wheel torque is a valid check. L3 requires driver attention, but hands off, so alertness system (such as camera) is needed. L4 does not need driver attention, so no monitoring system needed.
If Tesla's FSD software is validated as L2, it can jump to L4 and skip the monitoring needed in an L3 system.
No L3 doesn't require driver attention. Secondly hands on wheel detection IS a driver monitoring system.
Elon rejected camera based driver monitoring because he said the system is getting so good so fast that it would be pointless that by the time they implement it, the system would have already been better than a human. Then he gives timeline when human intervention would decrease safety. when the system would be better than a human. He said "maybe towards the end of the year".
You're clearly out of your element.
Last edited: