The guy’s a car salesman. He says absolutely anything he wants to. Always has, always will. Best to ignore him, even if we took him seriously at some point in the past (probably why we have the cars and the not FSD).
I have long since been cynical about anything said by anyone, and entirely distrustful of most media. Only after cross-checking a story with entirely different sources do I start to believe the story. Some people can earn trust with honest, repeated, verified statements, and by verified I mean by both sides of an issue. Elon is the opposite.
This kind of statement from Elon as reported by Reuters has no value to me whatsoever. A) It's not clear what he meant, nobody here can agree on any of his points. B) The report makes no effort to determine what he meant. C) There are no definite terms or guarantees to anything he said. Why do we even bother to discuss it, we can't know what he doesn't make clear.
Look at the media sources: Teslarati, Electrek, InsideEVs, MotorTrend, CNN, etc. Some are blatently pro-Tesla, Tesla-hostile, some are techno-clueless and get major points wrong. Reddit posts and Twitter are very biased in most cases. Which source you read determines how the story gets told. The truth - when it exists - I find often comes from a high court judgement or the NTSB, and perhaps Congress reports.
I find things Elon says to be amusing at best. He's either deliberately obtuse or he doesn't know what he's talking about and is just making up stuff. It's probably mainly the first one. It would be nice to see a reporter keep pushing to nail him down on a clear answer, with a definite timeline, to a promised date. He could do that (but won't), and I'll bet the honest answer is not "self-driving by the end of the year".
There should be a three-strikes rule for public speakers. Tell lies repeatedly and you're put on media-"ignore" for a period of time.