No. It definitely would. I make a 7-hour one-way drive several times a year (so nothing major, though I have in the past driven Florida<>Ohio once/twice per year also).
I can do my 7-hour drive with one pit stop (gas, food, restroom). I really don't need more than 15-20 minutes. Even if I need to make a second stop, I still won't be delayed anywhere close to an hour in total.
But using EVTripPlanner with an S60 with 19" wheels (which is as close to the base battery/wheel 3 as you can likely get), it calculates 2.5 hours of charging time. An extra 2 hours of travel and I haven't even left the state? That's absolutely pita-level.
Look, if you like taking significantly longer to travel from point A to point B, good for you. That's terrific. It's wonderful. I'm happy for all of you. But most of the world disagrees with you. If the purpose of my trip is to get to point B, that means I'm not at all interested in spending several extra hours of my day sitting on highway exits in towns I otherwise would never visit.
Was I willing to deal with the additional hassle - because for me it IS an hassle - of longer travel times on shorter/moderate-range trips? Yes. Was I willing to deal with it on longer drives like said Ohio<>Florida route? Absolutely not (hello, airport). But charging 4 times as fast would be an huge deal/improvement. That wouldn't be much different than my current 7-hour drive. And it would open up the possibility of me driving interstate instead of just intra.
Current Tesla owners shouldn't be telling people, "Oh, it's not so bad" or "Oh, you'll actually like the additional rest while driving." That's just not how the rest of the world works. The rest of the world wants the convenience of fast refueling like is currently available at gas stations. The rest of the world wants the convenience of longer range than current EVs don't allow for. There shouldn't be Baghdad Bob-ing of the issue.