Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Energy Sector News

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
The Scottish offshore wind licencing round results just in are very relevant to all USA seabords, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, and some France and Med littorals.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: SageBrush
The Scottish offshore wind licencing round results just in are very relevant to all USA seabords, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, and some France and Med littorals.

Cracking Floating/tethered turbine construction and maintenance would be a huge deal globally. It would open up lots of deeper shelf.
 
Cracking Floating/tethered turbine construction and maintenance would be a huge deal globally. It would open up lots of deeper shelf.
Indeed, and it is coming. Ten years ago we were just playing with 2MW units, now we are at 12-14MW units.

I think for the 20+MW class (which we were just sketching on the drawing boards ten years ago) it will be necessary to go almost entirely to floaters. For the sub-20 MW class they are already commissioning pretty ginormous lift vessels, such as this - and even then this is limited to 70m water depth


At least with a floater you can do a lot of the erection near-shore and then tow-out, and similarly tow back to near-shore for any major interventions, or for ultimate decommissioning (after prob 40-yr lives @ 20MW). So the lift vessels can be in sheltered shallow water for assembly and then it is just (!) tow vessels and anchor handlers and cable connectors out at site.

To put 70m water depth in perspective that already rules out a lot of northern North Sea.

And once the industry pivots to floaters then it is possible they will get deployed in shallow water locations in preference to bottom-fixed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fred42
This is really not looking good for prospects of Russia playing nice. If the weather stays normal there's another couple of months to go until Winter temperatures rise and Spring mud makes the ground too soft for heavy tanks.

During which all eyes are on gas stocks :


And is this bluff


Or this


And is this counter bluff


And triangulation is all very well, but surely its not an appropriate strategy for NATO

 
Discussion re environmental and social levies, mostly UK and Germany

Totally overblown. The costs are now low enough not to worry about it. If energy prices are high, as now, companies with price guarantees would be paying the government, not the other way round.
 
Totally overblown. The costs are now low enough not to worry about it. If energy prices are high, as now, companies with price guarantees would be paying the government, not the other way round.
I'm not sure about that. Renewables may now be cheaper on a levelised cost basis, but they are not cheaper on an upfron-cash cost basis. And as anyone who has a bank account knows, its the cash flow that hurts.

In any case this is a political fight being fought out in various places, here is another article on the same politics. Lose the underlying fight and I can guarantuee that renewables adoption will slow.

 
I'm not sure about that. Renewables may now be cheaper on a levelised cost basis, but they are not cheaper on an upfron-cash cost basis. And as anyone who has a bank account knows, its the cash flow that hurts.

In any case this is a political fight being fought out in various places, here is another article on the same politics. Lose the underlying fight and I can guarantuee that renewables adoption will slow.

Wholesale energy prices running high are what's prompting this concern FUD, and that _favors_ renewables and investment in efficiency and sustainability.
 
In case anybody missed the news the first of the European EPRs finally went critical at Olkiluoto 3 in Finland, so that was about 19-years after approval. The Chinese EPRs had a rather swifter build, time will tell whether there is any difference in the build. Next up should be the much-delayed Flamanville, then Hinckley.

 
UK tries to hold on to automotive manufacturing industry/etc in a post-Brexit landscape, courtesy of taxpayers with bribes for batteries


UK mfg

UK exports

(IMHO : This is going to be very difficult for the UK if the minimum economically-viable size for an auto-plant trends upwards. UK sales are about 1.6m, but a lot of UK-sales are imports. However about 80% of UK auto mfg is exported, and total mfg is also about 1.6m so there has been an OK balance-of-payments outcome for the last few decades. But UK mfg and exports are both falling steeply, no surprises given the Brexit carcrash. Most of the UK car plants are (imho) now structurally uncompetitive even before the BEVs start acting like a velociraptor in a bunny farm. Nisan Sunderland at ~500k/yr is pretty much the only plant that might be at-scale. If Tesla Berlin gets to the 4m/yr that I think is the 10-year target then any factory less than 1m/yr is going to be so uncompetitive it isn't funny. There's no way a post-Brexit UK can retain a competitive auto industry in such a scenario).
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fred42
An old study, resurfaced


contains this

1642947811436.png


Electrofuels? Yes, we can … if we’re efficient Decarbonising the EU’s transport sector with renewable electricity and electrofuels December 2020 Executive Summary The scale of decarbonising transport using renewable electricity is challenging, but the EU is well positioned to meet that challenge : the renewables potential in the EU far outstrips future demand. The EU could meet the transport sector’s demand for the direct use of renewable electricity, the electrofuels produced from renewable sources in sectors like shipping and aviation where direct use of electricity is not feasible as well as meet the electricity and hydrogen demand in other sectors like power and industry. In the next decade, there is a window of opportunity for European industry to become leaders in developing and driving down the costs of the technologies involved in producing renewablesbased hydrogen and other electrofuels. Currently, the major costs involved in transporting hydrogen over longer distances via ships (by liquefaction or conversion into ammonia) creates an opportunity for production in the EU or importing it via pipeline from its immediate neighbourhood. But for the EU to live up to this challenge, there is no scope to use renewable electricity inefficiently. Enabling the use of e.g. synthetic hydrocarbons in road transport, where technical alternatives such as the direct use of electricity exist, comes with a huge energy penalty and risks derailing the entire decarbonisation effort.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SageBrush
Everyone wants to mass produce offshore floating wind turbine 'foundations'


And every days brings another announcement of another GW of offshore wind

 
  • Like
Reactions: SageBrush