Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Blog Explaining the Six Levels of Vehicle Automation

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
The age of autonomous driving is upon us.

Automakers are making the promise of self-driving cars a reality. From street ready auto-drive systems to beta-tests of fully automated vehicles, the industry is driving towards a future where humans no longer sit behind the wheel.

Most players in this space are ushering in this era through incremental innovation. The “levels” of innovation are based on a six-part classification system published in 2014 by the Society of Automotive Engineers International, an automotive standardization body. In 2016, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration officially adopted them as the standard for autonomous vehicle technology.

The difference between the levels can be boiled down to the level of driver intervention and attentiveness needed to operate the vehicle. And while the levels may not be what new car buyers see on a spec sheet, they help clarify the principles behind different systems in development. They also help state and local governments set rules as to which self-driving systems may or may not be allowed on roadways.

Here’s a summary of NHTSA’s six-level classification:

Self-Driving Car Automation Level 0

No automation. This is driving as it exists in most cars today. You’re in control of the machine.

At Level 0, cars have no autonomous vehicle controls – but driving can be enhanced by warning or intervention systems like a blind spot indicators.

Self-Driving Car Automation Level 1

Driver assistance. With Level 1, the human still controls the critical driving tasks – but may get some minor assistance. The car might include a system that operates steering. Or the car may be able to help with acceleration/deceleration in certain scenarios. But Level 1 cars typically never take over both functions.

All the newest cars on the market now classify as Level 1 vehicles, because Stability Control was required for 2012 models. Cruise control (acceleration/deceleration) or lane correction technology (steering) also qualify as Level 1 technologies. This assistance offers some relief, but drivers still need to keep their full focus on the road.

Self-Driving Car Automation Level 2

Partial Automation. Both steering and acceleration/deceleration capabilities can be controlled by the car in pre-programmed or fixed scenarios. Level 2 cars can take over certain “driving modes” or tasks, but the expectation is that the driver is monitoring the environment and has their hands on the wheel at all times.

Systems like Tesla’s Autopilot or Volvo’s Pilot Assist II are well-known Level 2 automation features. They can help a driver stay in their lane and even slow down to avoid cars in traffic. Self-park features also help a driver with certain functions. Level 2 capabilities offer enhanced assistance over certain functions, but control is ultimately still with the driver.

Self-Driving Car Automation Level 3

Conditional autonomy. A seismic shift beings to happen at Level 3 – The cars themselves can safely control all aspects of driving in a mapped environment. But humans are still required to be present, monitoring and managing changes in road environments or unforeseen scenarios.

To date, no Level 3 cars have hit the market, although several, like Audi’s A7 prototype, are in testing and development phases. Level 3 technology has stirred up controversy, with some industry players saying it’s not realistic to expect a driver to remain as alert as needed, if they’re only passively monitoring driving functions.

Self-Driving Car Automation Level 4

High automation. At Level 4, cars have reached self-driving automation. No driver interaction is needed and the car will stop itself if the systems fail, which is an important distinction from Level 3.

Currently, automakers like Ford and Google have stated that they will bypass Level 3 technologies and develop Level 4 vehicles. These cars will be able to handle driving from point A to point B in most use-cases. However, the cars will include functional driving apparatus, like wheels, brakes and gas pedals. So humans can manually drive when conditions befuddle predefined use cases (i.e., off-roading,) or when they feel like it.

Self-Driving Car Automation Level 5

Fully Autonomous. At Level 5, the dream is realized. Besides controlling the destination, humans will have no other involvement in driving the car – nor can they intervene. Some manufacturers have promised that 2021 is when fully autonomous vehicles will be on the road. But getting cars to handle all roadways and all environments is a huge technological undertaking that involves fine-tuned sensors and massive computing power.

So far, prototypes at this level look nothing like the cars that we drive today. They don’t have steering wheels nor do they have gas and brake pedals. Instead, Level 5 vehicles are designed around enhancing the comfort and productivity of its passengers, with features such as offices or entertainment lounges.

Automakers target 2021 for Level 4 vehicles. The date for fully autonomous vehicles is even further off. Technology – and the regulations that govern the roads – will determine when we leave the driving to the robots.

This article written by MG Rhodes previously appeared in Dryve, which covers developments in driverless cars.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My guess is that those that stick to Level 5 as the top are overlooking the evolution to connectivity among Level 5 (or 4) vehicles and the benefits it will provide. Where vehicles can communicate in real time of slippery conditions, vehicles can travel much faster and closer together, and much more.

I officially call it Level 6!
 
OK, I've read this and Tesla's Definition of FSD Autopilot again. I'm guessing, but is FSD targeting Level 3 or 4?
Technically, a summons on public streets would be L5 if not for having a steering wheel, correct? Laws aside, hoping our M3 will take us to work then return home and park in the garage (covered parking), maybe by 2021.

Thanks,
John
 
OK, I've read this and Tesla's Definition of FSD Autopilot again. I'm guessing, but is FSD targeting Level 3 or 4?
Technically, a summons on public streets would be L5 if not for having a steering wheel, correct? Laws aside, hoping our M3 will take us to work then return home and park in the garage (covered parking), maybe by 2021.

Thanks,
John
I believe FSD will be L4 when complete. Maybe L5 will be reserved for the Tesla Ride Sharing Network.

Elon Musk offers more detail about Tesla’s ridesharing network
 
  • Like
Reactions: SOULPEDL
You can't actually have safe L3 and L4. By definition those can't handle everything and you cant just wish it OK.

L4 will practically be folks that rely too much on maps as a crutch. The perception software can't handle complex situations so they need to have things prelabeled but the real world is dynamic and incidents will happen.
L3 is the most idiotic of all, the car needs to know it can't handle something at the very least 3-4 seconds before it gets there and that's impossible. At 65mph the car travels at 29m per second and very often you don't have the visibility to see a few seconds ahead and allow sufficient time for handover.

L5 is the only viable option but it's not really properly defined. Take a 100 years old car, put a brink on the gas pedal and it's L5! It would be able to drive itself without a problem until there was a problem. Same statement is true for the most sophisticated system, the only difference being how soon the problem arrives. It would be good if the threshold is better than the best human driver in any scenario but nobody aims that high, they put profits first so they love to compare vs average driver on an overall basis and not for specific scenarios. Problem is, average driver is worse than vast majority of drivers (as the average is dragged down but the most irresponsible drivers) so yo really don't want to let your kids ride in such a car.
Another problem is that crashes are judged on a case by case basis because every person has human rights and the right to live is rather important. So the greediest folks aiming for the lowest threshold , will end up paying for it in courts and destroying their brand. People are not statistics, each and everyone has rights that you got to respect, can't kill one to save a million.
Tesla is at risk here as , for now, Musk loves to compare Tesla's stats with the average and that's aiming far far too low- the median driver is already likely a few times better than the average driver.
The autonomous car should really be compared with the best human driver helped by the best driver assist system. You can't call it safe if you don't beat that.

In the end, the robot has many advantages over human drivers ( better sensors, faster reaction time, better decision making) and the only weakness is the perception software, interpreting the data it gets from the sensors to understand the world. So it's not that hard to be better than the best human drivers once the perception software reaches a certain level of maturity. A pessimist could argue that narrow AI won't cut it, that the world is too diverse but it's likely that a lot of data and a lot of work will be enough.
 
Level 5 driving autonomy cannot and should not be described without mentioning the need for vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to infrastructure communication capabilities.

That's greatly overhyped by folks trying to sell silicon for it.
You got maybe 2 billion vehicles on the road and replacing that fleet takes decades.
Sufficient penetration for V2V to be of any relevance takes quite a few years and by that time the autonomous systems become far more capable and V2V doesn't add much of anything. Don't confuse the operator acquiring data from the swarm with V2V - something like live traffic data does not require V2V. V2V would help with near instantaneous data at short range but at low penetration that's not very helpful at all.
V2X (so to anything) is super costly and in most of the world you are never ever gonna have that infrastructure so you can't rely on it. Just like you can't remove the headlights today, except much worse.

V2X becomes more relevant when all cars are autonomous and V2X enables much higher speeds where it is present but for now, it can provide minimal upside at a huge cost.
And the need for V2V, absolutely not, it's not technically autonomous if there is such a need.
 
Last edited:
I don't believe the level 5 definition is correct. There is nothing in the Society of Automotive Engineers level 5 definition that requires the removal of the steering wheel or other driver controls. Level 5 can drive anywhere and under any conditions that a human can, so driver controls can be removed, but removal is not required.

Owners of level 5 cars may wish to have the option to drive themselves, especially when the technology is first introduced.

GSP
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nauti-Boy