BrandonF
Member
You do realise not-for-profit does not mean make-a-loss right?
The move clearly shows that owners are squeezing Tesla service out of every penny. It's a chicken and egg issue. I saw this coming from the first posts after EM made the not-for-profit announcement. You can see the trend in this forum itself.
Someone might have mentioned this already, but how can Tesla know the profitability of the Extended (Years 5-8) warranty when the oldest car on the road is 1 yr old? Now, maybe they are losing so much money on the repair/labor coverage of the original warranty and they are using the ESA increase as a profit center to cover those additional costs. That extra $1,500 is probably going to push a good amount of buyers to forego the ESA option, which will require Tesla to look for other areas to raise pricing to offset warranty cost.
If standard warranty coverage is being abused and cost increases as a result are causing this move then it seems to me that enforcing standard warranty rules is the way to go. I get the fact they want superior service but saying yes and covering the cost of everything people ask for isnt the only way to obtain superior service. Have the standard warranty spelled out and communicated clearly and up front with all owners and enforce it fairly when warranty service is requested.