No launch license yet, but expected soon.So maybe there will not be another B7 static fire before the orbital launch attempt. And it appears that the FAA has approved the launch license based on recent reports.
Time to light that candle!
I do not understand your post. How do we know an April launch is certain?This will launch in April. We all know that. Musk has been informed
He would then win the charity bet.I do not understand your post. How do we know an April launch is certain?
If you click on that link it will take you to post #32 on that thread. And then it will be clear to you and everyone why April launch is certainI do not understand your post. How do we know an April launch is certain?
I stand corrected.No launch license yet, but expected soon.
A time slot for SpaceX’s Starship orbital test on NASA’s calendar has been removed, adding new uncertainties around the highly anticipated flight of the world’s largest privately developed rocket.
This must be driving Elon absolutely nuts.On the regulatory side, however, SpaceX still has to settle a few issues with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which issues launch licenses for all space missions in the U.S.
SpaceX hasn’t received a license from the FAA to launch Starship just yet. The federal agency completed a lengthy environmental review of the proposed test in June last year and required SpaceX to take more than 75 actions to mitigate environmental impacts related to the flight.
It was obviously not clear to me.If you click on that link it will take you to post #32 on that thread. And then it will be clear to you and everyone why April launch is certain
😂
There is still pre-launch OLM work going on and ships are being built so lauch license isn't really holding up anything other than pad capacity.This must be driving Elon absolutely nuts.
You're expecting launch cost of SS to be more than F9? And a smaller version will help with that?I'm saying F9 will be the workhorse for non starlink missions for years to come--through end of decade for sure--because most current and near term missions aren't all that compatible with Starship. For sure there will be occasional commercial or beyond earth SS launches, but most customers care about the bottom line, and so most customers are going to opt for F9. SX certainly needs more money than they thought to get Starlink profitable andand Starship off the ground (you don't keep raising money if you don't need money) so certainly SX won't retire F9 until internally SS returns a cost advantage on external revenue.
I'm also speculating that Starship will evolve into a smaller, more versatile "2.0" because it likely won't ever get to that cost advantage over Falcon 9.
You're expecting launch cost of SS to be more than F9? And a smaller version will help with that?