Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
  • The final cut of the 8th episode of the Tesla Motors Club Podcast, featuring Balazs Biro, of the prominent Hungarian EV channel Villanyautósok, is now available. You can watch it now on YouTube or listen to it on all major podcast networks.

Fatal video: Tesla drives into concrete barrier. China


Active Member
Oct 2, 2013
SF Bay Area
Guangzhou: 微博
Quote from Google translate:
According to the driver's statement, the vehicle did not activate the automatic driving assistance function and was operated by the driver during the entire process.
Perhaps this post should be deleted and posted in the thread: Why we need driverless.
Quote: Passenger dies.


Active Member
Mar 11, 2020
Eastvale, CA
Don't give ideas. In China, they have executed people responsible for such design/construction problems (usually if a building collapses).
How much responsibility should you have when your laziness kills people?
In the US, we kill people that get angry and kill people.
Why is laziness any different?

BTW - I don't believe in capital punishment.


Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2012
Visalia, CA

The article erroneously described the Tesla "ignited spontaneously". There's an obvious cause in this case because it's a collision.

Tesla seems to explain that it's a case of manually passing the car in front at a high speed and collided with the concrete barrier instead.

I think if it was done with Auto Lane Change function, that wouldn't happen. That function is not standard and it costs more for either EAP or FSD.
Last edited:


Electrified Engineer
Supporting Member
Feb 2, 2021
How much responsibility should you have when your laziness kills people?
In the US, we kill people that get angry and kill people.
Why is laziness any different?

BTW - I don't believe in capital punishment.
Ahhh... the answers to your question are complex in detail but fundamental and ancient at base. I'm no lawyer but these are important principles.

Civilized and law-driven societies make critical and age-old distinctions among various degrees of premeditated murder, criminally negligent vs. truly accidental manslaughter, negligence contributing to death (I think criminal vs. civil considerations can apply quite differently here). The question of capital punishment or not is far deeper and more nuanced than "kill people who ... kill people". Laziness vs. hot anger vs. cold-blooded plotting are extremely different, and it's frankly not just intellectually lazy, but socially very dangerous for citizens to be unable to grasp those distinctions.

It's easy to pronounce that one does or does not believe in capital punishment; what's really more important is that punishment of whatever form be carried out in a properly-considered way and only after a properly constituted process that upholds serious, equal and established principles of law.

What a civilized and law-driven society does not do is to charge, try, judge and punish based not on pre-established law and relevant precedent, but on news chatter, social-justice narratives or the public's demands for retribution after the fact in a sensationalized case.

Regarding China and other near-totalitarian countries, It's quite common and quite reprehensible that, for example, a Chinese factory manager might get a show trial (or no trial) and a bullet in the aftermath of a fire in which locked-in workers perished with no escape - while many other similar factories continue to operate in sweatshop conditions with similar potential catastrophes. The adjudged guilty manager was most likely carrying out the production-quota demands of the local party officials, then became the scapegoat when it went spectacularly wrong.

In the case of the highway barrier, do you really think that one "lazy" civil engineer or draftsman can correctly be assigned responsibility for a dangerous feature which, by the way, may have taken decades in the USA and Europe to be generally recognized, communicated, best-practice-modified, regulated in code and enforced in inspection practice?

Which employee or official, in which office along the chain, are you going to say committed a Murder out of laziness which (per your question) is hardly different from that of a depraved criminal with a knife?
What law do you want on the books to codify that, if an engineer specifies a safety rail with a dangerous end-cap feature, he may later be charged with murder?
Or maybe it was not the original civil engineer, but the draftsman who documented the plan.
Or maybe the checker who approved the plans.
Or maybe the budget-office official who sent the plans back for mandated cost reduction.
Or maybe the construction worker who didn't follow the drawing.
Or maybe the foreman who ordered the workers to take a shortcut.
Or maybe the truck driver who delivered incorrect materials.
Or maybe the warehouse clerk who requested the wrong components to be loaded on the truck.
Or maybe the government inspector who missed the deviation or violation.
Or maybe the contractor who paid off the inspector to ignore the details and sign-off the job.
Or maybe the local party official who pressured the contractor to come in ahead of schedule and under budget, maybe to have enough slush-fund yuan left over for the new carpet his wife wants in the house.
Or maybe the Beijing central-planning official who pressured the local party official to improve his district's performance and speed up the highway projects.
Or maybe the Interior Minister who needs a terrific performance report from the central planners, to advance his standing with the Premier.

I think you can guess approximately where on the list the punishment is likely to be meted out. More towards the beginning rather than the end, unless there is some serious infighting and power-struggle within the Forbidden City, for which a well-publicized accident provides just the needed political wedge.

In the absence of a robust and fair legal tradition, power and expediency become the law. And the resulting rulings are always explained based on Justice and the Interests of the People. If you are a devotee of the "news" in our country, you will see this foreboding pattern developing at an accelerating pace today.

I would urge you to consider these points seriously before you flippantly make an equivalence between Death-Penalty Murder and lazy or ill-advised infrastructure design. The latter can indeed have serious or deadly consequences but criminal prosecution and retribution are a very poor way to develop robust public-safety practices.
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bedoig

Products we're discussing on TMC...

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.