croman
Well-Known Member
I actually think AP has been really good for me. Go figure. Locally it's very confident and smooth. Sees cars and keeps better track of them. Displays them more accurately in IC.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't look too dramatic on that video.I agree with a lot of the post here regarding AP taking a step back on this update. I almost crashed today because AP was slow to respond to traffic slowing down that I had to slam on my brakes.
Here's a video of it since I wanted to make sure it wasn't anything out of the blue that might have caused it to act so slow.
AP on Nav: ON
Car Spacer: Set to 1 car only (Moved it to 5 after this incident)
It happened at about the 10 second mark. You can clearly see the car in front stopping yet my car was still going the same speed. I quickly had to slam on my brakes just to stop in time.
Car Spacer: Set to 1 car only (Moved it to 5 after this incident)
Off thread topic... According to the Model S Owner's Manual:I had set the distance to 1 car length.
In other words, a "time-based distance" depends on speed, whereas a car-length distance doesn't. For example, on freeways where the limit is 65 mph, I generally set TACC for 75 mph and following distance to 1. I would never follow at a distance of one car length at that speed.Each setting corresponds to a time-based distance that represents how long it takes for Model S, from its current location, to reach the location of the rear bumper of the vehicle ahead of you.
Thanks. Yes, I was traveling on the hwy and the time based distance was 1 car length as I mentioned in the post and as you posted here. However, I think AP and TACC decides how I follow the preceeding car with respect to traveling speed for that 1 car length and I don't decide that as long as I don't press the accelerator.Off thread topic... According to the Model S Owner's Manual:In other words, a "time-based distance" depends on speed, whereas a car-length distance doesn't. For example, on freeways where the limit is 65 mph, I generally set TACC for 75 mph and following distance to 1. I would never follow at a distance of one car length at that speed.
I have a few questions:
1. I have 2014 AP1. I have always been able to use Chademo since day one. Never had issues with it. Do I need to update to 2019.24.4?
Don't let your car connect to WiFi seams to be the easiest way to prevent updates. (it's not 100% guarantee, but close.)4. How can I completely disable updates? I really love 2019.24.1 which I am on now.
And you are making that statement based on one day of data? Tell us what happens after a week or moreGot the update yesterday, and looking at TeslaFi it seems like it introduced higher ranger loss when idling. My range loss for a usual "idling day" went up by a factor of 5.
What made me look in the first place is that the car was immediately turned on when I got in after my work day, as opposed to actually having to wait about 10 seconds before the ICU screen turns on. I might have to check if my energy saving settings were somehow changed during the update.
Very little changes are being made to AP1 behaviour. None of us on AP2 can tell you for certain but it's likely it hasn't changed at all in a very long time.I have a few questions:
1. I have 2014 AP1.
2. My AP works pretty well for me, is this new 2019.24.4 update that much better AP?
Bad assumption that "1" means one car length. It doesn't. It depends on distance at a given speed (time spacing). Even so, I would NEVER at this stage of AP, set anything to "1". For me that is having too much confidence in the car's ability and if it does the wrong thing, I have less time to react. When things get better, I might eventually go down to that level, but not now. I am more of a "4" type of guy and I don't care if it leaves more space in front.I had set the distance to 1 car length. I had 2019.20.4.2 before. MCU2, AP 2.5, Oct 2018 build.
There was a problem in earlier firmwares (.16 and prior) where there was a slight risk of changing lanes into oncoming cars - there were a few reddit and twitter posts about it. They tightened up lane changing in the direction of the oncoming vehicles (left for LHD, right for RHD) a lot making it often impossible to initiate such a lane change. They seem to have relaxed that restriction a little in this release as well, but I still have trouble more often than not moving into the right lane (RHD.)With this update I’m now able on two lane highways to change from the right to the left lane. Prior to this it would only allow lane changes left to right.