dirkhh
Middle-aged Member
Interesting - according to your entry in the tracker you got 2.4.124, while several other classics today got 2.4.136... I wonder why...
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Firmware 6.2 poll to say when you got it
- Thread starter MikeBur
- Start date
Truth is, it was installing so just guessed. Now that it's finished installing I see i was 2.4.136. I'll update database.
HankLloydRight
No Roads
If you save a firmware update record with the same date, it will overwrite the existing record. But if the date is different, it will add a new record. If that happens, just let me know and I'll fix it.
dirkhh
Middle-aged Member
So it looks like after a bunch of almost exclusively AP cars got .124 we are now seeing mostly classic cars getting .136 (so far no AP car has reported in with .136).
That is fascinating. I love this tool. What a brilliant idea. Oh. Oops.
Great work HankLloydRight!
That is fascinating. I love this tool. What a brilliant idea. Oh. Oops.
Great work HankLloydRight!
NigelM
Recovering Member
@dirkh: Time your turned your mathematical skills from reputation points to FW roll-out algorithms?
VIN 00282 is still patiently waiting btw.
VIN 00282 is still patiently waiting btw.
dirkhh
Middle-aged Member
There's a lot more money, err, reputation points in bs-ing about reputation points, but yeah, I'm very curious figuring this out. And there's a very clear trend.
So far only one <10k has received it OTA (two at the SC)... lowest VIN is 1500, so I guess no Sig has gotten 6.2, yet.
of course, all this is based on very incomplete data. I keep sending people PMs and post in all threads, asking people to update the tracker... that's the only way we can get enough data for meaningful analysis...
Fixit. Thanks:smile:
- - - Updated - - -
Can't tell you how satisfying is it is to finally have something over the Sigs. Won't last, I'm sure.
HankLloydRight
No Roads
Enhanced one report to add Auto-Pilot columns:
Updates by Model/Autopilot
Created new daily build summary (last 10 days). It's a rolling 10-day window. Cool report, thanks Dirk.
Updates by Build/Day
Updates by Model/Autopilot
| Model | Trim | Count | Auto Pilot | Non Auto Pilot | Min Build | Max Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 60 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2.4.124 | 2.4.124 |
| S | 85 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 2.4.124 | 2.4.136 |
| S | 85D | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2.4.124 | 2.4.124 |
| S | P85 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 2.4.124 | 2.4.136 |
| S | P85+ | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2.4.124 | 2.4.124 |
| S | P85D | 39 | 39 | 0 | 2.4.124 | 2.4.124 |
Created new daily build summary (last 10 days). It's a rolling 10-day window. Cool report, thanks Dirk.
Updates by Build/Day
| Build | Total | Today (t) | t-1 | t-2 | t-3 | t-4 | t-5 | t-6 | t-7 | t-8 | t-9 | t-10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4.124 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 36 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2.4.136 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dirkhh
Middle-aged Member
Andyw2100
Well-Known Member
Would it be difficult for you to enhance this report with the (rolling) actual date and day of the week? I realize it shouldn't be necessary, but from a user-friendliness aspect, if it would be easy for you to add, I think it would make the report easier to understand.
There'd be small print below your "t-x" numbers. When you posted the above, t=Friday, 4/3. So then the next column would have, "Thursday, 4/2" under t-1, etc.
Just an idea.
mgdurand
Member
So I must have missed an early post explaining this, but why does Tesla have to "roll out" the software update over time rather than just pushing it to all cars? Does Tesla have a tiny computer or something?
The generally accepted reasoning on this is that if there is a flaw/bug in the software that wasn't discovered during normal testing that is discovered during the general release Tesla can halt the deployment and fix it. In the meantime the bug is on a limited number of vehicles and not deployed to the entire fleet at once.
HankLloydRight
No Roads
Yes, of course.. but there was only so much I could do last night from my notebook in a hotel room at midnight tethering on 4G over a VPN.
I'll put in the bells and whistles later.I also wanted to give it a SpaceX feel.
Last edited:
Larry
Member
dirkhh
Middle-aged Member
Interesting. Still not a single AP car has received .136...
Edited to add: and it seems AP cars are still receiving .124 (at least we had two entries for .124 from AP cars today)
Edited to add: and it seems AP cars are still receiving .124 (at least we had two entries for .124 from AP cars today)
Last edited:
aneusomy
Member
Just got mine today!
P85 received Sept 30 2014, just missed to autopilot but got the updated steering stalk.
(2.4.136)
P85 received Sept 30 2014, just missed to autopilot but got the updated steering stalk.
(2.4.136)
Andyw2100
Well-Known Member
Over time it will be easy to see patterns and probably infer whether or not that is the case.
If the current hypothesis is that the P85Ds (or all Ds) weren't really getting updated in higher numbers or first, but there are just higher numbers of P85D owners (or all D owners) active on TMC because the models are new, then if in a year or two, when the the models are no longer new if they are still getting updated in higher numbers or first, we'll more reasonably be able to reach conclusions about what is happening.
mesalum
Member
I wonder if it is more a function of VIN range. I see 5xxxx is up to .136 but beyond is not.
Similar threads
