Indeed, both or my cars now charge correctly after installing 2.13.77. Amazing what a little bit can do
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Indeed, both or my cars now charge correctly after installing 2.13.77. Amazing what a little bit can do
Soolim
Member
GlmnAlyAirCar
Active Member
This is the first time I'm going to do this on a forum and is not meant to be disrespectful in any way... Can we please take this back to discussion of relevant 7.1 firmware issues, features, etc.?
I'm a geek just like the rest and love to read hacking/reverse engineering info, but I'm more concerned with issues that others are having and how to solve it (dual charger issue, navigation and the like).
I'm a geek just like the rest and love to read hacking/reverse engineering info, but I'm more concerned with issues that others are having and how to solve it (dual charger issue, navigation and the like).
Ok.. not 'that' computer savvy. But, just wondering here that if a software engineer put a line of code in to temporarily hold a place for a 3 digit vs 2 digit identifier (such as 100 vs 90 or 85), it may be possible that the 100 is just an arbitrary number. The fact that it was not removed would not surprise me as most software contains junk code that is no longer utilized and cumbersome to remove.
So I'm guessing it's going to be 140kW.
So I'm guessing it's going to be 140kW.
I probably should have started a new thread starting with this post, admittedly. If I a mod would be gracious enough to carve this conversation out to a new thread, preferably starting there, that would be great. Otherwise I'll just start a new thread soon now that I've slept on it and conferred with my attorney.
dirkhh
Middle-aged Member
We are still seeing reports of upgrades to 2.13.77 - so I don't think it has been recalled. Admittedly, they have slowed down a bit. But definitely reported long after the incident with 2.13.77 disappearing on wk057's car.
GlmnAlyAirCar
Active Member
I'm on 2.13.77 on both the S and the X, with summon enabled and the constant touch disabled (I prefer to use the key fob rather than the app). Unless I'm missing something, I can still enable summon on the S with the fob, but it does not work on the X. I also miss the unlock with the double press of the button on the gear selector (it now activates summon/park).
Anyone here with an X successfully using summon with the fob on 2.13.77?
Anyone here with an X successfully using summon with the fob on 2.13.77?
dirkhh
Middle-aged Member
Can we PLEASE make this a thread about "Firmware 7.1" ?
I know, this is asking a lot, but seriously. There are plenty of other threads around to discuss wk057 and his relationship with technology and with Tesla.
I know, this is asking a lot, but seriously. There are plenty of other threads around to discuss wk057 and his relationship with technology and with Tesla.
I went ahead and reported my own initial post on the topic to the mods in the hopes that they'll be able to carve this discussion to a new thread. Apologies for the derail.
Andyw2100
Well-Known Member
I posted in anticipation of the posts on this topic being moved to a new thread. I'll write a mod privately now, to alert one to the need.
Ulmo
Active Member
The car I drove had this same message. I found it to be useful and informative. Usually, I would turn off AP features and drive myself on such roads before the notice had a chance to come up or as soon as I noticed this message, but once I got used to it, I learned I could just readjust my speed to match the restriction if I chose to, and the usual holding of the wheel firmly let me naturally make my own driving choices and naturally let AP disengage as I drove differently. Occasionally, a road would pop up with this restriction which ended up having quite a safe travel distance with the above behavior with the car in charge, such as many highways without many obstacles (technically, low-ways since the valleys have the smoothest earth to put highways in).
Eventually, this message trained me to not even bother with most AP features unless I was on actual freeways, and in those conditions, AP made driving generally easier, as I could be somewhat more sloppy when there were no obstacles and the car would just do its thing with my hands on the wheel. Of course, the normal AP concerns would come up when obstacles got near, and I would turn my full attention to driving for the moments needed.
Ending (merging) and beginning (multiple choices) lanes never did work well while I was using AP (at least to my confidence level), and exits and entrances also did not work well; the merge software hasn't been written, probably because the car doesn't have enough hardware to be able to merge.
I generally would disengage the AP features once I entered highways, for safety, since I didn't want the car to suddenly make me have a head-on collision, except for the adaptive distance control which I generally liked in far more conditions than the adaptive steer control. (I always kept it at distance 7.) This eventually made me long for the freeways, and I would be happy when the highways turned back into freeways and I could go full AP again.
Last edited:
BobV
Member
I jumped from 2.10.71 to 2.13.77 and the auto-brightness no longer keeps turning the night-mode brightness all the way down to zero during twilight. If you unchecked the box in a previous release, you might want to try it out again
Johan
Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!
Excellent post. You have observational skills and "first principle thinking" way above average, kind of like Elon.
Ulmo
Active Member
What if the feature to update maps was installed with the new firmware, and the maps themselves were updated later with a different update, and you're just now seeing the new feature active for the first time? Just one possibility. But I really like the coolness of the idea of a big update growing out of its seed pod into a full adult program, so I actually prefer your version.
Cyclone
Cyclonic Member ((.oO))
A moot issue at this point, but I got to an 80 amp HPWC today to test my car with 2.12.45. At 60 amps and 80 amps selected, the car sits at 30 amps or 40 amps for about 10-15 seconds and the continues its ramp up. I believe wk had said that was the firmware that includes charging differences, just most people jumped over that to 2.12.126. Hopefully that means I won't have the problem once I accept the pending install.
Ulmo
Active Member
Maybe they got colorblindness data and decided it was a safer color to use for a higher percentage of the population, requiring fewer exceptions to be made for those with different color profiles in their eyes. There are a larger number of people who cannot see the differences between the earlier part of the rainbow, such as the difference between orange and yellow or orange and green, so that graphic might be hard to see for them, whereas the blue line would be clearly visible to them.
Ulmo
Active Member
They can write virtual hardware testbeds. I really don't see how they could get by without doing so.
Similar threads
