For someone who is praising the value of statistics and hard numbers in making claims about safety of this or that technology, you are pretty quick to claim AP2 is safe based on a shaky analogy (aka, your sample size is not even 1).
Or in your own words : there are all kinds of reasons why technology may fail or help. Just because one implementation increases safety doesn't mean a different one does too.
@schonelucht, I have explained my views at length upthread. Tl;dr: (1) anecdotal reports like those in this thread are meaningless in terms of assessing the system safety of AP2 compared to average drivers; (2) in the case of AP1 anecdotal reports turned out to be inaccurate in assessing system safety; and (3) Tesla has the AP2 data, the track record and every incentive to ensure AP2 is being rolled out safely so IMO it has far more credibility than anecdotal reports (especially those by mostly anonymous internet posters). Items 1 and 2 are statistical points. Item 3 is, in part, a judgment call.
Last edited: