You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Old news, non-issue, FUD.
It's still mentioned on the Model 3 page:
View attachment 318459
And on the configurator:
View attachment 318460
Confirmation bias is strong in those ones.I think the author of the article in question is an idiot.
I think the people commenting on the article buying it hook line and sinker are even bigger idiots.
I think the author of the article in question is an idiot.
I think the people commenting on the article buying it hook line and sinker are even bigger idiots.
Not sure what you saw in the article that's not accurate.
The article says:
1. Tesla dropped the $35K from their page - this is true; It's been reported elsewhere on this forum with screenshots.
Except for those who can't afford it.Only my experience, but when I got my first Tesla I noticed I wanted to drive more. My usage went up to near 27000 miles a year, near double of when I drove gas cars. It became apparent that the long range battery was more valuable than I had thought.
I only hope those of you who think you only need the SR battery will not be sorry. I think the LR is very worth it.
Except, it's not actually true, so there's that.
Post #4 in this thread shows the standard SR model is still there.
Their website also still mentions the 35k price specifically in the model 3 press kit.
You read too much into my statement - I didn't say or mean that the SR model was removed, and the article also didn't say that. It merely stated that the price was removed. Here's the direct quote from the article: "But later in the day, Tesla revamped the Model 3 page, removing any mention of a $35,000 price (or any other price) in the process." When I said the $35K was removed I meant no more and no less than the text with the actual number.
Is this statement in any way not true?
Teslas web page with the model 3 press kit said:Model 3 is designed to achieve the highest safety ratings in every category. Combined with 220* to 310 miles of range and a starting price of $35,000 before incentives, Model 3 is Tesla’s most affordable vehicle yet
The automobile department's editor at Arstechnica is blatant Tesla hater (and all around pud, to boot). To the point of being comical (it's a really bad look for an otherwise reasonable and modestly reputable site). That particular writer, and innuendo article, is not even close to the worst example that you'll find there.I think the author of the article in question is an idiot.
I think the people commenting on the article buying it hook line and sinker are even bigger idiots.