You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your range seems reasonable. You have 12000 miles of use and it’s winter.
I don't believe he's talking about real world range, but rather rated range when charged. Rated range isn't affected by wind or weather.Remember the range is based on the EPA highway drive cycle with the car hooked up to a dynomometer in a indoor location. Therefore no wind drag and no speeds exceeding 60 mph.
This is the same for all cars so it is a fair comparison. But the connection to real world driving is a stretch
I don't believe he's talking about real world range, but rather rated range when charged. Rated range isn't affected by wind or weather.
True but irrelevant to the discussion of rated range at 100% charge as displayed on the battery meter.Remember the range is based on the EPA highway drive cycle with the car hooked up to a dynomometer in a indoor location. Therefore no wind drag and no speeds exceeding 60 mph.
This is the same for all cars so it is a fair comparison. But the connection to real world driving is a stretch
No. Rated range is rated range. Nothing to do with your driving pattern.OK. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Is it affected by your power consumption/speed?
There's not much of a winter in Orlando...
Anyway, the MX 100D is rated for 296 miles. So 285 is only a 3.7% decrease which seems right in line with expectation. I wouldn't worry about it.
and your 100% charge when new was?...Hi all,
12k in my X100D and charged last night set limit to 100% and only got to 285 miles.
I was a bit disappointed. Should I get her serviced?
No, it’s all bad. I’ll take it off your hands for 10 cents on the dollar.Hi all,
12k in my X100D and charged last night set limit to 100% and only got to 285 miles.
I was a bit disappointed. Should I get her serviced?
295**. More likely the OP needs a few deep discharges and full charges for it to recalibrate. My 100% used to be 293 at new now it’s 295.
Just bear in mind that doing this is not actually very good for the battery itself, it only affects the arbitrary number shown on the dash. So I wouldn't personally bother and in fact don't even bother displaying rated range, having reverted to percentage charge in the setup menu. The nav and energy tabs take care of "real life" range and are way more accurate than rated range, which is often grossly optimistic given my driving style!
I know this is a bit of apples to oranges, but when I was charging my car to 80% (as the standard limit) I had worse degradation when when I charged my car to 90%. Those are two different cars mind you, made 7-8 months apart and I don't know what charging policy was like in the first 4 months.I used to charge to 80% all the time but now im doing 90%. The difference in battery degradation over time between 80-90% charging is so minimal its not worth having to worry about it for me.
Worse degradation? Unlikely. More like worse estimation.I know this is a bit of apples to oranges, but when I was charging my car to 80% (as the standard limit) I had worse degradation when when I charged my car to 90%. Those are two different cars mind you, made 7-8 months apart and I don't know what charging policy was like in the first 4 months.
not really. The data seemed pretty spot on when I charged to 100% and then run to 0% on a road trip (and when charging to 100% there was a modest bump in capacity compared to the predicted 100%)Worse degradation? Unlikely. More like worse estimation.