TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Fisker Karma

Discussion in 'Electric Vehicles' started by vfx, Oct 15, 2007.

  1. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    Hmm...by whom? I think it looks like, well...crap. It's over-styled, exaggerated, and dated looking.

    Obviously, aesthetics are largely subjective.

    The "value" of that car to me is next to nothing and the drivetrain is laughable in 2017. Actually it was laughable in 2012.
     
    • Like x 2
    • Disagree x 1
  2. SoCalGuy

    SoCalGuy Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,416
    Location:
    So Cal & New York, NY
    ecarfan, you're obviously entitled to your opinion and indeed aesthetics are subjective. That said, your opinion on the Karma styling is squarely in the minority. Just as popular opinion finds (generally) Jennifer Aniston and George Clooney attractive, the reviews of the Karma in 2012 generally praised its styling. I don't have an exhaustive list for you at the ready, but here are a few links I found quickly through the Google:

    100 Most Beautiful Cars of All Time

    Used Cars For Sale - Appraisals, Used Cars & Certified Pre-Owned Vehicles | Edmunds

    The Most Beautiful Cars Ever Built

    Also, I disagree that it's drivetrain wasn't in innovative for 2012 - it came out before the Model s by a good 6 months and only faced the Volt as its main competitor. There was no other EV with range extender at the time and the Volt's gas engine was mechanically linked to its wheels unlike the Karma which was purely electrically driven. In 2017, the Karma's powertrain is hardly innovative or efficient - it's amazing what happens in 5 years. But I can tell you having owned (and still own) two Karmas for the last 5 years, it is a competent (though quirky and sometimes finicky) EV. I regularly get 39-44 miles of pure EV driving per charge and on longer haunts, get around 27 mpg on the highway in range extend mode - not terrible for a 4 seater. Could the performance be better? Sure. Could it be more efficient? Sure. But this is 8 year old tech brought to market 5 years ago. Context is important.

    It's a shame Karma didn't improve the Revero despite some opportunities to have done so 2 years ago (inside politics and culture killed those).

    Bottom line: being a Tesla fan doesn't mean you have to unduly "crap" on other EVs.
     
    • Disagree x 3
    • Like x 2
  3. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    I'm fine being in the minority, but want to emphasize that Jennifer and George are indeed very attractive in my opinion. ;)

    I don't consider the Karma an EV. But to each their own...
     
    • Like x 1
    • Disagree x 1
  4. SoCalGuy

    SoCalGuy Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,416
    Location:
    So Cal & New York, NY
    On this point, this is simply a matter of fact. The propulsion of the Fisker Karma is entirely electrically driven. Fact. Not an opinion.

    The simple matter of it being able to draw electricity from a portable battery pack of 20kwh (like the Tesla MS), or from its portable gasoline-based generator (2.0L ecotec) is irrelevant. The argument implicit in your "opinion" re:drivetrain would support someone saying "I don't consider a Model S an EV" because it gets its electricity from coal or nat gas.

    An EV is a car that is propelled entirely by electric motors. For the Fisker Karma and the Tesla Model S, this is true, ergo both are EVs.
     
    • Disagree x 2
  5. SoCalGuy

    SoCalGuy Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,416
    Location:
    So Cal & New York, NY
    Just for fun... one of my Karmas. #love

    IMG_9982.jpg
     
  6. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,107
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    That's one definition. By your definition a diesel-electric train is electric. But really, it's completely irrelevant that the energy goes diesel -> electricity -> propulsion rather than diesel -> propulsion.

    The Karma will never be more than a PHEV in my view. Which is fine. PHEVs are better for the environment than pure fossil cars.
     
  7. SoCalGuy

    SoCalGuy Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,416
    Location:
    So Cal & New York, NY
    From Wikipedia:

    "An electric vehicle, also called an electric drive vehicle, uses one or more electric motors or traction motors for propulsion. An electric vehicle may be powered through a collector system by electricity from off-vehicle sources, or may be self-contained with a battery, solar panels or a generator to convert fuel to electricity.[1] EVs include road and rail vehicles, surface and underwater vessels, electric aircraft and electric spacecraft."

    This thread is feeling more like the comments section on a Fox News article - with people arguing that certain facts and definitions are merely opinion ("the science of climate change is still unsettled", "the world is round is your opinion but for me it's flat"). If you'd like to be precise, you could say that the Fisker Karma is not an "all-electric" or "pure battery" electric vehicle which is totally accurate. Those are subclasses within the EV category.
     
    • Disagree x 1
  8. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,107
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    By that definition a diesel-electric locomotive is an EV. Agree?

    (I'm perfectly okay with saying the Karma is *at least* as good for the environment as a diesel-electric locomotive!)

    But I'll admit the battle for the definition of "EV" was lost. It is so watered down now that it is useless. The english term to look for is now "BEV".
     
    • Like x 1
  9. SoCalGuy

    SoCalGuy Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,416
    Location:
    So Cal & New York, NY
    I think the term EV became appropriated by the BEV folks when in reality it was meant to point to a larger class of vehicles locomoted by electric motors. BEVs are great and thinking about 5 years ago when exactly zero BEVs had ranges approaching 300 miles or more, cars like the Karma made tons of sense because they offered people the only opportunity to drive mostly electric (e.g. work day driving to/from work, grocery store, etc) for about 40 miles without worrying about range or without having a need for a second car for longer trips (e.g. Like going from LA to Vegas or SF). When in range extend mode, you get 24-27mpg which is not the best but also not terrible either. Now that we are in 2017 and M3 looks to offer 300+ mile range for $45K and there are an order of magnitude more superchargers, the calculus has changed and some BEVs make much more sense.

    As an aside, what really irks me sometimes on TMC is the fanboy phenomena where people can't acknowledge the strengths and positives of other vehicles and tech because "Tesla is the best" - some commenters (not you) remind me of the posters I see on Fox News messageboards that simply refuse to acknowle basic fact etc. It can be maddening! (And yes, I know that these types of users only are a small fraction of the TMC community but sometimes they are the most vocal!)
     
  10. ggr

    ggr Expert in Dunning-Kruger Effect!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,967
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
  11. RubberToe

    RubberToe Supporting the greater good

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,958
    Location:
    El Lay
    I guess you weren't following the thread where Jennifer was spotted on the beach after eating a Cheeseburger... :D

    Model 3 Mule Sightings
     
    • Funny x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC