You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was hovering over the 'Order' button when I saw your post. The Quartz article links to the original NY Times article that states that "company executives" decided that 300 of the 5,000 welds could be eliminated. While I'm sure engineering had input into the decision I must say this bothers me. Even if the welds are unnecessary, removing them has to have some effect on rigidity. Wouldn't this remove some redundancy or safety margin in a severe accident? If a critical weld fails in an accident, the "redundant" welds might have helped maintain body integrity. Also noise, vibration and harshness could be altered. I hope this doesn't introduce squeaks and rattles!
The other companies might also be improvising similar things but we don’t hear those things
the original NY Times article that states that "company executives" decided that 300 of the 5,000 welds could be eliminated.
Thanks, I missed that reading too fast. Well, I've pushed the button so I'll be getting one of those cars with 300 fewer welds in the Sep-Nov timeframe.From the article
"In recent weeks, company executives concluded they could produce Model 3 underbodies with fewer spot welds than they had been using. The car is still held together by about 5,000 welds, but engineers concluded that some 300 were unnecessary and reprogrammed robots to assemble the steel underbody without them."
Yes the "Executives" concluded that the "Engineers" made the right call to eliminate some 300 unnecessary welds.
I was hovering over the 'Order' button when I saw your post. The Quartz article links to the original NY Times article that states that "company executives" decided that 300 of the 5,000 welds could be eliminated. While I'm sure engineering had input into the decision I must say this bothers me. Even if the welds are unnecessary, removing them has to have some effect on rigidity. Wouldn't this remove some redundancy or safety margin in a severe accident? If a critical weld fails in an accident, the "redundant" welds might have helped maintain body integrity. Also noise, vibration and harshness could be altered. I hope this doesn't introduce squeaks and rattles!
One reason I like Tesla is because of their excellent crash-worthiness. Does this change invalidate any crash testing done to date?
How do you know 5000 welds is the right amount? Why not 5300 for extra redundancy?
Even if the welds are unnecessary, removing them has to have some effect on rigidity. Wouldn't this remove some redundancy or safety margin in a severe accident?
Because of the "Engineers"
what about 5700 or 6285 I mean it is up to the engineering team to decide what is the right amount, If you put to many spot welds to close together then you actually can weaken the metal so it is possible that it is even stronger now, how would we know? because the engineers said so I guess? like others have said I'm sure this stuff goes on all the time but it never makes the news because its not Tesla
Why is everything Tesla so wide in the news? Who cares about these welds?
It almost seems that a Tesla with a flat tire would make a headline nowadays.
The headline bothered me too. I'm also concerned about the production line "tent" and the push to reach 5,000 a week.
It was sarcasm, in case it wasn't obvious. See, "6001 hulls" after.