And, more importantly, this appears to be the first wide release since 10.8.1. As of now, they have pushed this update to everyone currently running any version of FSD beta. No new FSD beta testers though (yet!).75% of FSD beta users are now on 10.10.2
Tesla FSD Beta News, Software Update Release Notes and Statistics
Tesla FSD Beta software update release notes and statistics.www.notateslaapp.com
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Wiki FSD’s Earliest Adopters Still Waiting
- Thread starter Lowchrg
- Start date
valem
Member
Do you think they will push FSD which is on the 2021 branch to cars on the 2022.4.5?
hybridbear
Active Member
RGloverii
Active Member
I hope they remember about ‘us’ soon…
EVNow
Well-Known Member
They have done that to beta cars that went to service and got a higher general branch build. We’ll see in the next couple of days what they do.
BTW, my guess is the 2022 branch based FSD Beta will be 11, not 10.x. So, depending on when that comes out, if they don’t push 10.x to cars on 2022 general beach, it might be a while ….
TresLA
Member
Yes, FSD beta cars also have to emergency update due to ATT sunsetting 3G tomorrow. Other car manufacturers have been notifying owners of updates needed (not just Tesla). I feel bad for other car manufacturers that can’t upgrade over WiFi or don’t have 4G radios.
Not sure if this thread helps: 2022.4 required to maintain AT&T compatibility
Shane23
Member
2017 Model S, FSD, 99 SS;
Pressed button as soon as available having
No invite for upgrade
Pressed button as soon as available having
No invite for upgrade
Same here 2017 Model S 99 SS no invite for camera retrofit - Made 3 appointments in the past 4 months, and they have cancelled every single time citing that I have to receive the invite first. Looks like they did not stagger camera retrofits, they just did a few to silence the crowd and then stopped doing camera retrofits altogether/sending out new invites.
valem
Member
Obviously it is terrible that so many have not received the camera retrofit invite, however I don't think that they did a few just to silence the crowd.
The parts shortage is real.
It has taken about 2-3 month from camera invite to complete retrofit, and for many that's been over several trips to SC, with wrong parts, missing parts etc.
Imagine if they didn't stagger the invites and everyone could make appointments, the 2-3 months probably would be 3-6 months or more.
Where I think they made the mistake IMO is not properly prioritize the invites (as they appear to be completely random)
To be fair it should have been based on opt in date and safety score like it is explained on the website.
Instead people got invites without being opted while others with 100 didn't get it.
Cheburashka
Active Member
Yes I kind of agree. I had a pretty bad score I guess and got the invite. At some point I had a bunch of single digit scores too.
Either way, my appointment was cancelled due to parts availability.. with no new people being added to the beta, it's not looking great.
That said, I'm glad I got the invite so I could immediately opt out of the stupid scoring system. Hopefully they send another round soon. It seems like they send them every month and a half or so. Good luck, we are in this together.
tezlaMXUR17&24
Member
Shane23
Member
That’s another thing, seems like the invites aren’t really based on much if it still takes 3 months to get the parts needed for said retrofit..
Maybe it’s too much to ask logistically but If you send the invite out to customer assuming most service centers doesn’t have the parts in inventory or not all; the parts should be acquired by HQ for your VIN, name, SS, and FSD Status and then when you make your appointment at specific service center the parts are forwarded from HQ to service center and a date is given based on delivery date +/- 3 days.
The Box should have customer name on and be the correct part numbers for that car; with a service bulletin explaining procedure to whatever tech is assigned to your vehicle.. This would alleviate the service center tech’s ordering incorrect parts because their brains are just trained to replace broken parts with same parts.
But I digress, I feel like as most nice people our brains are more lenient and patient to something that we think we’re getting for free. Versus if we paid for this everyone would be up in arms, maybe the argument can be made that we were told our cars would be capable of FSD with “current hardware” and here we are new computers and pending camera retrofit later still we can’t get what we paid for.. /end rant
Maybe it’s too much to ask logistically but If you send the invite out to customer assuming most service centers doesn’t have the parts in inventory or not all; the parts should be acquired by HQ for your VIN, name, SS, and FSD Status and then when you make your appointment at specific service center the parts are forwarded from HQ to service center and a date is given based on delivery date +/- 3 days.
The Box should have customer name on and be the correct part numbers for that car; with a service bulletin explaining procedure to whatever tech is assigned to your vehicle.. This would alleviate the service center tech’s ordering incorrect parts because their brains are just trained to replace broken parts with same parts.
But I digress, I feel like as most nice people our brains are more lenient and patient to something that we think we’re getting for free. Versus if we paid for this everyone would be up in arms, maybe the argument can be made that we were told our cars would be capable of FSD with “current hardware” and here we are new computers and pending camera retrofit later still we can’t get what we paid for.. /end rant
Looks like V11 is in progress and might be what they were waiting for for new additions as others speculated.
10.10.2 was likely to satisfy the recalls hence why it’s still a 2021 branch to get it out as soon as possible. Let’s hope the next release is V11 on a 2022.x branch that includes us!
Daniel in SD
(supervised)
better or worse than 
?
Cheburashka
Active Member
@Cheburashka what were you doing? street racing / tokyo drifting? (too fast too furious)
I posted earlier in this thread - my wife was able to get a score of 2 by getting multiple FCWs on a single drive, which is why I was happy to finally turn off the safety score.
Hoping V11 comes in March/April and a bunch of invites come along with it!
Seattle Tom
Member
⚡️ELECTROMAN⚡️
Village Idiot
Does anyone else think the safety score has been easier to maintain lately? I've had quite a few instances recently that I think would have triggered an FCW, but didn't.
Yes, I suspect the same. On one trip I expect it will be a disaster as I have to disengage AP and ended up F2C several times but it didn't happen.
Tesomega
Member
Selling new cars are the priority, not fixing existing ones.. Same problems appeared in earlier days when no parts were available for repairs (due to accidents or otherwise), however new cars were not impacted... The same thing is true here.. blame the repair queue on parts shortage!.
Coming up on the 5 month anniversary of the "button" and the SS mess they've implemented. There's still no doubt in my mind, prior to the release of requesting beta, Tesla knew about this particular issue with the cameras. The fact they have waited this long to address it, tells you what they think of us as a customer. If you want to feel some love, place an order for a new vehicle, they'll call you more than 5 times a day.
Similar threads
