Go Ducks!Go (Anaheim) Ducks!
But yeah... my weak attempt at lightening up the thread failed horribly.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go Ducks!Go (Anaheim) Ducks!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but one year later and I think we are still seeing disengagements for the same reasons.Many of the disengagements we've seen are mostly:
Gets into wrong turn lane
Moves into different lane over complicated intersections
Difficulty turning into narrow roads with cars
Correct me if I'm wrong, but one year later and I think we are still seeing disengagements for the same reasons.
A few posts ago, I mentioned that 10.2 is much better at unprotected lefts vs 10.1, over span of only 2 weeks
How are you still seeing the score ?95 Safety Score this morning,
How are you still seeing the score ?
Elon didn't specify the base of the exponent IIRC. The graph of an exponential function where the base of the exponent is <1 is a decreasing slope.Musk says the improvements are exponential. I'm just saying we may be way out on the negative axis where the change with time is slow, small slope. So it looks like not much is happening to get us to level 3 (time = 0) any time soon. Exponential doesn't necessarily mean what Musk implied, fast change with time.
...
I pulled out of my house yesterday, at the first light it stopped to make a right, light turned green, so it started to proceed into hitting a woman and her stroller. Had to disengage there.
A lot of the disengagements depend on the presence of a third party. If there is (a woman with stroller) or if there is not.It’s not even close to 500 miles unless you were on the interstate for 500 miles driving strait and even then it’s doubtful.
I feel like it is 10-15 miles on well marked roads with stoplights and 0-5 miles on other roads.
$50 for the app ? The same price you pay for an OEM Windows copy. Economies of scale, I guess.It's actually called, "Stats." Available for iOS.
$50? Wow, haha. I paid $10, early adopter I guess.$50 for the app ? The same price you pay for an OEM Windows copy. Economies of scale, I guess.
Yeah, I paid 10 bucks, too. Can't believe it's up to 50... it's a nice app, but no where near worth 50 bucks to this cheapskate.$50? Wow, haha. I paid $10, early adopter I guess.
Based upon, exactly, what? Please back this up with hard data.Sigh. Maybe I'm not cut out for beta testing.
So a long way to go. I expect it will be at least 6 months before this sort of issue is substantially better and turns can be made reliably, smoothly and correctly.
Sure, and China may annex Japan. Climate change may reverse itself without our intervention. Who knows?May require a couple fundamental rewrites!
It's my expectation (a guess!) based on my evaluation of FSD Beta so far. Overall it seems like it has a very long way to go. Bookmark my post and check back in 6 months to see how we're doing! I'd be thrilled if it were reliably approaching that unprotected left (the only difficult turn I routinely have to make), smoothly executing it, and entering the correct lane of westbound traffic, within the next six months, with no intervention. I just think it's unlikely (so far I've had to intervene every single time - pushing the accelerator to get advanced enough, and so far I'd have to steering disengage on every attempt if I wanted it to be smoothly and correctly executed - so about 0 for 6 so far).Based upon, exactly, what? Please back this up with hard data.
The fundamental rewrite comment was obviously a little tongue in cheek. Wouldn't be surprised though!Who knows?
Speculating on faith, past history, and insider forecasting...? Elon does it too. "(something will improve) in (some amount of time) probably, (some longer amount of time) definitely"Based upon, exactly, what? Please back this up with hard data.
...
These kinds of statements drive me nuts. All speculation with no basis.
Just procedural code, won't need rewrites, as such. From AI day, looks like they are continuously trying to improve the number of simulations the optimization needs to run - so in that sense there is continuous improvements.So a long way to go. I expect it will be at least 6 months before this sort of issue is substantially better and turns can be made reliably, smoothly and correctly. May require a couple fundamental rewrites!
You gotta remember that there are a lot of people that don't know that FSD is a fundamental re-write. For those that did know that little tidbit, the tongue-in-cheek is pretty obvious, and well-played, IMO.The fundamental rewrite comment was obviously a little tongue in cheek. Wouldn't be surprised though!
Unless it's a perception problem. It's really hard to say why it would drive across double yellow lines. Was that caused by an error in the procedural code (some escape path caused by a combination of circumstances in this simple turn case), or was it caused by a dropout or failure of perception somehow (did it lose track of the yellow line and forget about it, when it got too close to it)?Just procedural code, won't need rewrites.