qdeathstar
Completely Serious
Perhaps you would like to comment on the videos provided before attacking someone else’s analysis, or did you not watch them before spouting from the hip?lmao give it a rest. Your ignorance is astonishing.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps you would like to comment on the videos provided before attacking someone else’s analysis, or did you not watch them before spouting from the hip?lmao give it a rest. Your ignorance is astonishing.
The amount of traffic clearly affects FSD’s performance in unprotected turns.Yup, but remember that FSD doesn't take those things into consideration.
It's very clear at this point Tesla will achieve fsd at human-level+ statistics soon (at wide release).
Instead of poo pooing others for being enthusiastic, you could give your assessment?lmao give it a rest. Your ignorance is astonishing.
It ls not bad as a level 2 driving aid though. And what really matters how is how much it Improved vs it’s previous iterations
That's an average of 1 disengagement per 40 minutes of driving. Personally, I don't think that is a good disengagement rate for FSD. Although it is lacking a lot of info. We don't know the type of disengagement, type of driving, number of miles etc...
If only Tesla would release the disengagement data, then we could maybe quantify the progress better.
It ls not bad as a level 2 driving aid though.
That is why I said "for FSD". Yes, for L2, it might be ok. I could see situations where for short commutes (say 10 minute drive), especially if traffic is not very bad, the car could probably do the commute with no interventions. So as long as the driver is paying attention, it could be a nice convenience feature for some owners. When Tesla improves the rate say 10x, it might good enough for L2 wide deployment. But it will be important to make sure the driver is paying attention especially as the rate gets better to avoid complacency. As the drivers do hours of driving with no intervention, they will start to get complacent.
My personal opinion so far is one step forward, no step backward.9.1 seems like 3 steps forward, no steps backward
That is a bold prediction. What data do you base this on? What is FSD beta's accident rate? What is FSD beta's safety disengagement rate? What is FSD Beta's safety envelope violation rate? How many safety false positives or false negatives does FSD beta have per detection? Don't you think we need well, statistics, if we are going to make judgments about statistical safety?
I don’t base it on any data. It just ends up being my opinion, but it’s starting to seem like 9.1 will perform as well or better on Waymo-equivalent routes in Chandler, and we know that Waymo’s service in Chandler is human level+.
Waymo doesn’t have have three disengagements in two hours.
Instead of poo pooing others for being enthusiastic, you could give your assessment?
Waymo can do a 10 mile loop 10,000+ times without a collision.I don’t base it on any data. It just ends up being my opinion, but it’s starting to seem like 9.1 will perform as well or better on Waymo-equivalent routes in Chandler, and we know that Waymo’s service in Chandler is human level+.
People talk about how easy some of the 9.1 routes are, but most of them are actually much more complex than the ones Waymo takes in chandler: