TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

FSD competition is here

Discussion in 'Autonomous Vehicles' started by Moderatefan, May 15, 2018.

  1. Moderatefan

    Moderatefan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Waymo's driverless taxi service details revealed in DMV application

    So, Google seems to be beating Tesla to the driverless taxi network.
    In Q1 call Musk said they expect to be ready technically by EOY 2019.

    Waymo claims to have Level 4 capability now and applied to DMV to operate the first 52 vehicles, hoping to operate 20K in 2 years.

    Tesla will need to play a catch up game here.

    One interesting thing is that they plan to test in the heavily-mapped area. So, FSD will depend on maps being up-to-date. I assume Tesla will want to use someone else's maps, rather than create their own from scratch. Will Google though want to be liable, if someone else's FSD car jumps off the cliff due to incorrect maps? Interesting how this will get resolved.
     
    • Informative x 1
  2. voip-ninja

    voip-ninja Give me some sugar baby

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,586
    Location:
    Colorado
    #2 voip-ninja, May 15, 2018
    Last edited: May 15, 2018
    A lot of people who are more knowledgeable about the technology have insisted that level 4 and up FSD would have to take place initially in urban areas in which every minute detail of the environment was mapped in excruciating detail in order for the car to have to make fewer split second decisions about what to "expect" when navigating the area.

    Seems like a perfect marriage for a taxi service that will only operate in a specific urban zone.

    Musk continues to be the only one who insists that cameras can do the job that everyone else is relying on LIDAR to do;

    What Is Lidar, Why Do Self-Driving Cars Need It, and Can It See Nerf Bullets?

    People who paid Tesla $3,000 for full self-driving might be out of luck

     
    • Informative x 1
  3. Runt8

    Runt8 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,545
    Location:
    Colorado
    Isn't the difference between level 4 and level 5 the fact that level 4 is sandboxed to certain areas?
     
  4. voip-ninja

    voip-ninja Give me some sugar baby

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,586
    Location:
    Colorado
    Not necessarily from what I understand. It could be something like "road type" vs specific geographic areas.

    Example is the car might be able to navigate highways and city streets if they are a certain width or have a certain configuration, but would require the human pilot to take over if turning onto a street that exceeded the system capabilities.

    Path to Autonomy: Self-Driving Car Levels 0 to 5 Explained | Feature | Car and Driver
     
    • Informative x 2
  5. kengchang

    kengchang Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2017
    Messages:
    929
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Human ain't got LIDAR
     
  6. voip-ninja

    voip-ninja Give me some sugar baby

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,586
    Location:
    Colorado
    Using that comparison, the Tesla Model 3 doesn't have human brain's processing power, which is estimated to be roughly 1 ExaFlop, the current Nvidia platform in the Model 3 is good for about 1% of that raw processing capability.

    Right back at ya fella.
     
    • Like x 5
  7. brkaus

    brkaus Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    4,961
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    And some pretty questionable neural nets...
     
    • Funny x 4
  8. novox77

    novox77 1.21 Gigawatts

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,137
    Location:
    NH, MA
    As far as AI goes, there's two types here: narrow intelligence and general intelligence. Narrow AI is focused on very specific tasks, like driving, or playing chess. General AI is an open function to be smart at anything you throw at it. Musk believes narrow AI is sufficient for FSD. It's commonplace for narrow AI to surpass humans these days. This is why he thinks LIDAR is a crutch. He's basically betting the ranch on that narrow AI neural net. Very risky and also uncertain when the narrow AI is finally on par with that sliver of our intellect when it comes to driving.
     
  9. Moderatefan

    Moderatefan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    I'm not positive its about areas, it seems the latest guidance from NHTSA was from 2017
    Technology & Innovation

    This 2.0: Vision for Safety pdf https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf
    States Level 4 is
    Maybe they can say it doesn't operate in snow. As long as deficiencies are clear.
     
    • Informative x 1
  10. GatorGuy

    GatorGuy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2018
    Messages:
    533
    Location:
    Jacksonville
    Computers also always pay attention, on everything, 360 degrees and never get tired. They can respond quicker and more exact than any human.

    That said, I wish that Tesla was going overboard with redundancies. I would like to see LIDAR, FLIR and multiple forward facing cameras. Rather than seeing how little they can accomplish FSD with, they should be trying to make it as safe as possible and not "safe enough".
     
  11. kengchang

    kengchang Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2017
    Messages:
    929
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Do you use 100% of your brain power to drive? Doubt it
     
    • Like x 1
    • Funny x 1
  12. Moderatefan

    Moderatefan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    I think this bundling of "everyone else" as "advanced" is inappropriate.
    It looked like Uber had a pretty bad progress based on articles following the fatal accident. Their system was asking the driver to take control all the time, regardless of Lidar.
     
  13. Moderatefan

    Moderatefan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Problem is, they had no idea what challenges they may have at the time they installed hardware. This was shot in the dark, sort of.
    Once they have a chance to test FSD, it'll be more clear if it's safe enough. Maybe it's fine in 99% of cases and if something breaks, the car can safely stop to satisfy this from guidelines:
     
    • Like x 1
  14. roblab

    roblab Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,990
    Location:
    Angwin (Napa Valley) CA
    Mebbe so, but you KNOW that a goodly portion of that exaflop is not worried about driving, but about what's on the radio, what the significant other said last night, what's for lunch, who's driving that cool red car up ahead, whether there's a cop around the next bend, and whether or not I ought to floor it past the kid in the Corvette. Nvidia only thinks about boring stuff, like driving, which is probably only about 1% of what I'm thinking of.
     
    • Love x 2
  15. Moderatefan

    Moderatefan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Plus humans are bad at multi-tasking, so all this thread management must be eating up at least 50% of the available capacity.
     
    • Like x 1
    • Funny x 1
  16. Tezlanian

    Tezlanian Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2018
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    North America
    Humans multitask constantly and parts of the brain work almost autonomously just reporting to results to higher executive function. It's that top level that doesn't multitask well. Those ares are a much small percentage of overall brain.

    And yes, I knew you were joking :)
     
  17. voip-ninja

    voip-ninja Give me some sugar baby

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,586
    Location:
    Colorado
    Do you use more than 1%? I know I do. Much more than 1%.

    I used to ride sport bikes in the canyons. Uses similar amount of brain power as flying performance aircraft, which is a LOT.

    Nobody who rode motorcycles for years and a hundred thousand miles surrounded by distracted idiots in cages trying to kill them drives casually around using 1% of their brain.
     
  18. kengchang

    kengchang Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2017
    Messages:
    929
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    So do you need 1 ExaFlop or not? If not quoting that number is pointless
     
    • Like x 1
    • Disagree x 1
  19. Stolz25

    Stolz25 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2017
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    Tulsa, ok
    Of course not, I need at least 75% to type out responses on forums, mayebejsjjduisjsi
     
    • Funny x 1
  20. insaneoctane

    insaneoctane Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,553
    Location:
    Southern California
    No way! You know how many times I've gotten to my destination and couldn't remember anything about the drive because I was driving as a "background" task?
     
    • Like x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC