gearchruncher
Well-Known Member
Care to link to these? Tesla has published AP numbers for years now that are highly debated given how statistically broken they are. I'm intrigued to see what you consider as them "specifying the safety of FSD" in a way that is not refuted.owever, Tesla is the only one that is sending data out to specify the safety of their systems ( I don't see/hear much actual data to refute their claims).
I assume what you mean is it's very safe when it's vigilantly monitored by an attentive driver that disengages it the instant they identify it doing something wrong?I've been using AP and FSD Beta combined for over 2 years. Anecdotally, it's a very safe system when using it correctly(!!) in the operational domain intended.
Ok, so is it safer than NOT using it? What is the point of using it if it doesn't reduce your workload? How is it "Assisting" the driver? How is it demonstrating that Tesla is on the road to L3+ Autonomy?