Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

FSD rewrite will go out on Oct 20 to limited beta

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
1. No, there were plenty of people, calling FSD vaporware.
Vaporware - Wikipedia
wikipedia said:
... became popular among writers in the industry as a way to describe products they felt took too long to be released. InfoWorld magazine editor Stewart Alsop helped popularize it by lampooning Bill Gates with a Golden Vaporware award for the late release of his company's first version of Windows in 1985.
When it reaches level 3 or 4 than we can say "full" self driving actually exists. Until then I think we can still call it vaporware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GZDongles
Vaporware - Wikipedia

When it reaches level 3 or 4 than we can say "full" self driving actually exists.

It can be level 3 or level 4 tomorrow if Tesla decides to make it such - the only difference is whether it nags for the steering wheel and who pays if there's an accident.

Of course, if Tesla or anyone else decides to make it Level 3/4 too early, the increase in accidents will have serious impacts on the public perception of autonomous cars, and might lead to legislation against it. Not to mention the cost of the accidents themselves.

So clearly Tesla shouldn't want to make the switch until they're confident it'll get into fewer accidents than humans do, which is why they're doing this level 2 FSD period gaining confidence and maturity in the system before tell the drivers they don't need to pay attention.
 
Vaporware - Wikipedia

When it reaches level 3 or 4 than we can say "full" self driving actually exists. Until then I think we can still call it vaporware.

Semantics, fine.

In that same definition depending on which point you pick, other companies could be defined having vaporware as well. Not only in terms of SAE level expected but also in terms of availability to the general public.

It's more about managing expectations. Elon has not been great about it, has been overly optimistic. Other companies have been years late in different ways.
 
Last edited:
Wonder how long before there is pothole detection and avoidance.

Elon said they're labeling potholes, so it'll come eventually, but I'd rather Tesla focus on fixing the dangerous situations and polishing every turning scenario first.

Tesla is in a prime position to accelerate FSD development. It seems they've got their software foundation "right" this time. Their data engine is producing results. They've got a good human driver and NN perception feedback loop. We know this because Karpathy said this FSD beta build was the result of many months (not years) of hard work. It was a subtle flex IMO:

Screenshot_20201023-211031_Chrome.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanCar
1. No, there were plenty of people, calling FSD vaporware.
2. I have not stated that I believe that the current FSD beta is anywhere near Waymo (geofenced) in reliability at this moment. I agree with you, it's likely near 10 miles or less in disengagement.
3. I don't know what the future holds, Elon may be wrong about reaching 1 million miles per disengagement.
4. If I remember right, you last year referred to Investor day as a mere trick pony show and that Elons claims about FSD were blatant lies made to pump the stock valuation. This was back in the good old days when you and Diplomat used to argue all day long. While FSD beta is a small step, and Elon has been terribly wrong on some of his predictions, I'm still optimistic about where they go from here.
I really don't think this is true. The capability Tesla has demonstrated so far was achieved a decade ago. The fact that they are achieving it at much lower cost really isn't evidence that they're close to achieving robotaxi capability. Relative to where they were it's definitely a quantum leap. I think most of the skeptics, like myself, have observed that many companies have quickly gotten to the point where the car can do a good approximation of driving for 100 or 1000 or 10,000 miles only to stall out. The fact that every other company has also made overly optimistic predictions should make you less optimistic about Tesla, not more. The entire history of artificial intelligence is full of people making overly optimistic predictions. Maybe this time will be different. :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matias
I really like this guy’s vids. He and his wife are calm and he’s polite and takes over when the car might impede other drivers. It looks like he uses AP pretty similarly to how I do, actually. Impressive stuff from the vids.

yup, james taking over to not slow down traffic was a very nice gesture. i wish the camera was showing more of the wheel though
 
@diplomat33 are there any videos of Waymo doing long commutes including freeways/highways?

No, not that I am aware of. But keep in mind that driverless rides in Chandler are in a 50 sq mi area so it is unlikely we would see an hour long commute on freeways. Also, we have less videos from Waymo because Waymo riders are just average people using Waymo to run errands. They are not tech evangelists who spend all day putting their drives on youtube like Tesla fans do. :)

We do have several complete rides and the longest video we have is the 1hr30mn one that is 4 rides stitches together. These videos do show us that Waymo's FSD can handle city driving very well as they are completely driverless with no problems at all and complete smooth.

Waymo has a disengagement rate in CA last year of 1 per 11,000 miles. So I think a hour long commute video from Waymo would probably be very boring.

I've seen at least one of the riders report that it appeared that Waymo specifically went out of it's way to avoid freeways/highways. Is that part of the ODD restrictions? (Chandler excluding freeways/highways?)

My report said that freeways were part of the ODD but that Waymo recently changed it. Waymo will probably put freeways back into the ODD again.