You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you, good idea. A few years ago we started the project by building a moat around them.Mexico has already started to build their own wall. So has Canada. Suggest you protect the island right away!
retail ?No one is worried about a merged Solar City and Tesla? Every solar incentive in this country is about to disappear and they're going to buy a solar company? Who is going to want to put solar panels on their roof when coal power is available for four cents a kilowatt hour?
I don't see it the way the OP sees it. If the belief were closer to "goodbye any chance of improving / expanding the 7500 tax credit with this batch of politicians", then I'm in complete agreement.
But the thread title indicates imminent repeal of the tax credit. I have two related thoughts, likely already expressed in the many pages of the thread:
1) Repeal of the tax credit will be bad for all makes and models of EV's - I agree with that. It will be the least bad for Tesla as Tesla is the one company building EVs that are straight up attractive as vehicles, and are readily available in lots of places that aren't CARB ZEV compliance states. In this context, I see companies relying on compliance cars to achieve their ZEV mandate as needing to eat an incremental $7500 on each car to reach their minimums. Fewer total EV's sold, but a higher % of them will be Teslas (or so I predict).
2) And do we really think that this batch of politicians are going to expend their energy, willpower, and political capital repealing something that was signed into law by President Bush (as best I can tell - here's the resource I found: Public Law 110-343 - Wikipedia) AND that has a built in sunset clause that will take it off the table all on its own? I just don't see this as a particular priority.
If it were coded into law as a perpetual 7500 tax credit that never expired, then yeah, I would see this as possibly being a priority.
My prediction and belief, specific to the 7500 federal tax credit for EV's - nothing substantive changes over the next 4 years.
And further, this is arguably the worst outcome for Tesla as a business (in terms of % market share), as the other manufacturers will get to continue taking advantage of the tax credit long after Tesla is able to.
EDIT: To add on - I expect we'll see a large number of executive orders signed by Obama being signed out of existence by Trump, and quickly. This particular set of actions is what I interpret Trump's comments about ending spending on climate change as targeting. This is easy and is little more than a matter of finding a pen, and a lawyer to draft a piece of paper for him to sign.
Big difference with this tax credit is that it is the law of the land, passed by Congress, and signed by President Bush. Repealing the tax credit isn't a matter of an Executive Order - it's a congressional action. If it WERE an executive order to get rid of it, then yeah, I'd be in agreement that it'll be gone approximately instantly - maybe the same day as the oath of office is taken.
I'm not hysterical about the election, however I do have a calmed concern about who Trump has selected to be his energy guy.Completely agree with you. Amazing how some people are so histerical about the election that they forget the system of "Checks and Balances" that we all learned about in say . . . 5th grade?
Seriously people, calm the @#$% down.
Completely agree with you. Amazing how some people are so histerical about the election that they forget the system of "Checks and Balances" that we all learned about in say . . . 5th grade?
Seriously people, calm the @#$% down.
You forgot "building the wall", kill Iran deal, kill NAFTA, deport "illegal" Mexican immigrants, and hire Independent Counsel to "lock her up". Yeah, pretty big agenda for day one much less first 100 days to worry about tax credits for EV's.Agree with both of you....I presume the key items that Pres. Elect/Congress will be focusing on are:
1) Fixing the Health Care law
2) SCOTUS
3) Infrastructure Investments
4) Comprehensive tax law modifications.....that involves a bunch of vested interests and I presume will take the most time.
Thus, i'm not worried about national impact to Tax Credit. I am however, worried about 3 launch which if implemented properly ensures Tesla's long-term survival. If not, we're in trouble.
So about that system of "Checks and Balances".Completely agree with you. Amazing how some people are so histerical about the election that they forget the system of "Checks and Balances" that we all learned about in say . . . 5th grade?
Seriously people, calm the @#$% down.
So about that system of "Checks and Balances".
If you recall from 5th grade, it was based on dividing power between the President, Congress and the Courts. The Republicans control the President and Congress. That alone is quite enough to repeal and/or pass any bill that doesn't affect a Constitutional right. With a new Republican Supreme Court justice, it's going to be difficult to even stop currently unconstitutional laws from passing.
There isn't anything else to do any "Checks and Balances" than the three branches of government. That's why people are getting hysterical.
Why did the Democrats have to do something (or not do something)?Completely understood. I would ask then, what did the Democrats do, or not do, for there to be such a voter backlash to setup this across-the-table run? Seriously. This represents a lot of pissed off people for someone as polarizing as Donald Trump to have these kinds of coat tails.
Filibuster.So about that system of "Checks and Balances".
If you recall from 5th grade, it was based on dividing power between the President, Congress and the Courts. The Republicans control the President and Congress. That alone is quite enough to repeal and/or pass any bill that doesn't affect a Constitutional right. With a new Republican Supreme Court justice, it's going to be difficult to even stop currently unconstitutional laws from passing.
There isn't anything else to do any "Checks and Balances" than the three branches of government. That's why people are getting hysterical.
Why did the Democrats have to do something (or not do something)?