You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The cost is more than first apparent because you continue to pay the highest tariff through the entire charging session even though your actual charge speed is dropping as the battery fills. In my Model 3 at a Supercharger, I average somewhere in the range of 1.5 - 2.0 kWh/min on good days and when I am able to charge mostly in the lower 1/2 of my battery capacity. It would work out to $1, and another 45 -- 60 cents per kWh at an EA location.Yes, a bit pricey. The new ones near me in CO:
$1 plus $0.89/min at 125kW or more, $0.58/min between 125kW and 75kW, $0.21/min at 75kW or less. Pass+ pricing: $0.60/min at 125kW or more, $0.42/min between 125kW and 75kW, $0.15/min at 75kW or less. 40 cents per minute additional if car not moved ten minutes after session ends.
The cost is more than first apparent because you continue to pay the highest tariff through the entire charging session even though your actual charge speed is dropping as the battery fills. In my Model 3 at a Supercharger, I average somewhere in the range of 1.5 - 2.0 kWh/min on good days and when I am able to charge mostly in the lower 1/2 of my battery capacity. It would work out to $1, and another 45 -- 60 cents per kWh at an EA location.
Up front costs for equipment and installation are high and then does one have to pay for the "land" the equipment sits on? If the company is a multi-million dollar one (which it probably needs to be to run the system) do the elected officials rail against these "money people" and impose another tax on it which is going to be passed onto the consumer?If useage was high, EA could make significant profit at these astronomical rates. Maybe profit margins will attract competitors a few years out. Sounds like a great franchise opportunity - i.e., buy electricity for $0.11/kwh and sell it for $0.60/kwh. Of course, the devil is in the details, but it could be lucrative. BurgerKing locates across the street from a busy MacDonalds so the same could apply at a busy EA site. Count me in as an investor.
You don't need taxes. Demand charges suffice to make these DC fast chargers a money losing proposition. And so they will remain until battery storage gets a lot cheaper.Up front costs for equipment and installation are high and then does one have to pay for the "land" the equipment sits on? If the company is a multi-million dollar one (which it probably needs to be to run the system) do the elected officials rail against these "money people" and impose another tax on it which is going to be passed onto the consumer?
If useage was high, EA could make significant profit at these astronomical rates. Maybe profit margins will attract competitors a few years out. Sounds like a great franchise opportunity - i.e., buy electricity for $0.11/kwh and sell it for $0.60/kwh. Of course, the devil is in the details, but it could be lucrative. BurgerKing locates across the street from a busy MacDonalds so the same could apply at a busy EA site. Count me in as an investor.
I don't see why the "convenience store model" shouldn't also work for EV chargers in the long run. I imagine that stores and restaurants near popular supercharger stations already benefit today, and the same will happen with EA once the number of EVs that can use them reaches critical mass. Perhaps the charger providers can develop a franchise model similar to Chargepoint, or figure out another way to get paid by nearby businesses.You'd be the first; EV charging has been around for nearly 10 years now and literally no one has been able to make a business model based on selling electrons to cars work. I liked Chargepoint CEOs comparison. Gas Stations don't make money selling gas... they make money selling $3 monster drinks. Selling electrons would be taking a terrible business model and making it worse. I predict tears in EAs future unless that find other sources of revenue other than kWhs.
I don't see why the "convenience store model" shouldn't also work for EV chargers in the long run. I imagine that stores and restaurants near popular supercharger stations already benefit today, and the same will happen with EA once the number of EVs that can use them reaches critical mass. Perhaps the charger providers can develop a franchise model similar to Chargepoint, or figure out another way to get paid by nearby businesses.
Also, in the next few years, EA will have an additional revenue stream from car makers such as Ford or Audi, who give their EV buyers discounted or free charging (and pay EA for it). This is essentially the Tesla supercharger "business model" (i.e. charging is subsidized by the car maker to sell more cars).
I predict tears in EAs future unless that find other sources of revenue other than kWhs.
Because that model is predicated on quick turnover (i.e. under 5 minutes pumping) and therefore high volume through the C-store. That's just not something that EVs are going to match at any point in the near to medium future. This is a purely technical barrier for EVs. Maybe if there is an eventual transition away from straight battery EVs and towards something like supercapacitors or a hybrid battery-supercapacitor system. The way to make a convenience store model work for EVs is to turn the charging itself into a profit center, i.e. make it very, very expensive compared to normal home/L2 charging. That way, the lower turnover and therefore lower store volume is mitigated against. But for a large number of reasons that has not been a palatable choice.I don't see why the "convenience store model" shouldn't also work for EV chargers in the long run.
You are taking the term too literal. What I meant is that chargers could be subsidized by nearby businesses that stand to profit from increased foot traffic or longer customer retention. That's not just convenience stores, but also restaurants, coffee shops, shopping centers etc. where customers typically spend more than a few minutes.Because that model is predicated on quick turnover (i.e. under 5 minutes pumping) and therefore high volume through the C-store.
The EVGo "Tesla connector" is really just a repackaged Tesla<>Chademo adapter that's bolted to the charger, and hence limited to 50kW. That can be useful in urban locations, but is very slow for highway locations used for road trips. A Tesla CCS adapter with a higher power rating would be more useful.hope they start adding tesla connectors like evgo is slow rolling
The EVGo "Tesla connector" is really just a repackaged Tesla<>Chademo adapter that's bolted to the charger, and hence limited to 50kW. That can be useful in urban locations, but is very slow for highway locations used for road trips. A Tesla CCS adapter with a higher power rating would be more useful.
This is where EA sites can be found: Locate a public EV charger | Electrify AmericaI can't see the EA sites in plugshare.... are they not displayed or do I have a filter setting wrong?