Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Help me decide: Model Y or Mach-E

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Can't complain about blind spot monitoring any more with a Tesla. The turn signal triggers the side camera lane view on the screen with the latest update. A quick glance assures clearance. It worked beautifully on my 200 mile drive this morning. There is also a setting for a chime, but I never had a traffic conflict to see how it works. I haven't had a chance to explore all the other upgrades from the last several days, including the Christmas light show.
 
Yeah, saw this posted today. Stuff like this always starts a fire over there. They just can't admit that Ford is screwing them.


After all this time, this is what they get as an update:

Two games and they rearranged some settings that were there already. I think CarPlay is now fullscreen too. No substantial bug fixes. And that interface reminds me of webOS back in the days of the Palm Pre.....sluggish and unpolished.
 
Last edited:
  • Funny
Reactions: FOOLSLFDRVNG
Yeah, saw this posted today. Stuff like this always starts a fire over there. They just can't admit that Ford is screwing them.


After all this time, this is what they get as an update:

Two games and they rearranged some settings that were there already. I think CarPlay is now fullscreen too. No substantial bug fixes. And that interface reminds me of webOS back in the days of the Palm Pre.....sluggish and unpolished.
I mean its not what Tesla does, but its better than what any other automaker does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daekwan
I mean its not what Tesla does, but its better than what any other automaker does.

Actually, Ford is behind others if you're comparing robust firmware update capabilities. Companies like Lucid, Nio, Xpeng, Polestar and soon to be Rivian (to name a few) all have systems that can do OTA firmware updates, and some have already sent out more substantial ones. Even GM might actually be ahead (or soon to be) of Ford in this capability as well.

With a service model like what Ford currently has (where dealerships can call the shots with regard to service), and the fact that the Mach-E's software is bug-ridden, the ownership experience is more likely to be a miserable one over the long haul, especially for those that expect their vehicles to work as intended and are looking forward to timely updates.

Ford vs Tesla in this regard might not seem fair, but it's what the thread title asked for.
 

Actually, Ford is behind others if you're comparing robust firmware update capabilities. Companies like Lucid, Nio, Xpeng, Polestar and soon to be Rivian (to name a few) all have systems that can do OTA firmware updates, and some have already sent out more substantial ones. Even GM might actually be ahead (or soon to be) of Ford in this capability as well.

With a service model like what Ford currently has (where dealerships can call the shots with regard to service), and the fact that the Mach-E's software is bug-ridden, the ownership experience is more likely to be a miserable one over the long haul, especially for those that expect their vehicles to work as intended and are looking forward to timely updates.

Ford vs Tesla in this regard might not seem fair, but it's what the thread title asked for.
Yeah - note how all the companies you mention were not ’legacy’ car manufacturers.

A fundamental flaw in with the legacy makers is their ‘stealership’ model. These outlets are set up so they make the majority of their profits on service making a direct disincentive to sell low maintenance cars like an EV or to have over the air updates like Tesla. I’ve even seem some quotes from dealerships saying they were marking up the Mach E price to make up for lost service revenue. WTF??? The other part of the problem is this model is actually codified in state laws, making a huge obstacle for companies like Tesla that want to do it differently.
 
Speaking of dealers, I saw a bit of history in a blog yesterday. Henry Ford started his dealer model as a result of an offer to buy 750 cars in advance by a customer who planned to resell them. Ford realized that by selling to dealers, every car that came off the assembly line was already sold. Around a hundred years later Elon Musk discovered that every car he built was already sold by the online method, therefore dealers were a waste. Funny how the same basic "presold" motivation led to different results.

Dealers will never go away for legacy automakers with franchise dealerships because of 50 different state laws plus franchise contracts that protect the model. One can only hope that reforms can improve their operation. It's possible that with the large number of takeovers by multi dealer companies that big organizations might negotiate methods of operation more suitable to customers because of competition from direct sellers.

BTW, sooner or later Staes that outright ban direct sales from companies who don't have franchises will face pressure from consumers to allow competition. I heard a dealer association executive say on a blog that the dealer model is far better for the customer. If that is so why do dealer associations fight so hard to block direct sales companies?
 
Last edited:
BTW, sooner or later Staes that outright ban direct sales from companies who don't have franchises will face pressure from consumers to allow competition. I heard a dealer association executive say on a blog that the dealer model is far better for the customer. If that is so why do dealer associations fight so hard to block direct sales companies?
Because they are altruists working for the public good, obviously. /s
 
I can't speak for the European dealers like Audi, Mercedes, BMW etc... or other high-end brands that go out of their way to make their customers happy, but the ones I've dealt with over the years, both domestic and import, have all been predatory when it came to sales and sketchy to dishonest when it came to service with very few exceptions.

I'd really like to know if the States that insist on this model actually care about the consumer. They can't claim they're unaware of what takes place on a daily basis. IMO, they're all part of the scam. We can talk about overhauling the laws all day, but until the consumer votes with their wallet, nothing will change.
 
Last edited:
I can't speak for the European dealers like Audi, Mercedes, BMW etc... or other high-end brands that go out of their way to make their customers happy, but the ones I've dealt with over the years, both domestic and import, have all been predatory when it came to sales and sketchy to dishonest when it came to service with very few exceptions.

I'd really like to know if the States that insist on this model actually care about the consumer. They can't claim they're unaware of what takes place on a daily basis. IMO, they're all part of the scam. We can talk about overhauling the laws all day, but until the consumer votes with their wallet, nothing will change.
Follow the money. Politicians need money for elections and dealerships are more than happy to donate.
 
In late September, I placed a deposit on the the Model Y ($53,990 for Long Range, Pearl White, 19" Gemini, Black Interior) and the Mach-E ($53,100 for Premium, Extended Range, RWD, Grabber Blue). Both were originally scheduled to be delivered in April, though the MY is now showing a Feb 19 - March 19 delivery. I can only buy one. There are still many months before I need to decide. As of today, I am exactly 50/50 on which I will pick. Some of this decision will depend on the available tax credit at the time of purchase. Hopefully congress gets its act together and both get a credit next year. If one is substantially cheaper due to a tax credit I will likely go that way (though hard to say if the MY shows up without a credit and the Mach-E still has one but is still months away from delivery).

Anyway, I need your help! I've put together a list of pros and cons in the fine tradition of Benjamin Franklin and Walter White. These lists are specific to my own decision, as I see it. Please let me know if any of these considerations are off base, or if there is anything else I should be considering. I will post the two lists in subsequent posts.

And full disclosure... I also cross-posted the same lists on a Tesla forum. It will be interesting to see the differences in replies... Here are the lists:

Advantage Tesla Model Y
  • Known reliability. Tesla has been making EVs for a while now, and has straightened out a lot of early production issues. Ford is just getting started, so there are likely to be a lot more issues for the first few years. Will a 2022 Mach-E be as reliable as a 2022 Model Y? What will the difference in cost of ownership be in 10 years?
  • Polished UI. The touchscreen is really snappy, whereas the Mach-E touchscreen is sluggish. The Tesla software seems a little more refined too.
  • Supercharger network. I have a lot more confidence that I won’t get stranded on long trips.
  • Joy of driving. I’ve seen plenty of YouTube videos of people testing these two cars side by side and stating they enjoy driving the Tesla more, especially comparing the one pedal driving. Granted most of these people are Tesla owners, but not all. I have taken a test drive in both, and Tesla even gave me an overnight test drive. I will admit, the Tesla did feel a bit more responsive on the pedal, though it wasn't a huge difference.
  • Performance. The Model Y base model does 0-60 mph in 4.8 seconds, and comes with AWD standard. The Mach-E RWD model I ordered does it in 6.1. Yes, I could upgrade to the AWD model and achieve 4.8, but this is an extra $2.7K. (Aside, I actually prefer the longer range and cheaper price which is why I’m not upgrading the Mach-E.)
  • Cargo capacity. 68 cu ft vs 60 doesn’t seem like much, but it could make the difference. I am choosing a hatchback for a reason: I want to carry things.
  • Autopilot. As of today, Tesla’s autopilot is more capable than Ford’s version. Ford is still developing theirs, so this could change. I have no interest in FSD.

Advantage Ford Mach-E
  • Body Style. The Mach-E looks great. The body looks muscular. The LED projector headlights on the Premium look amazing, as do the taillights. I also like the futuristic look of the Model Y, but not as much.
  • Paint and color. I ordered the Grabber Blue and love this color! I would almost buy the car just for the color. The Tesla looks good in white, but I don’t think is as much a head turner. Also, I’ve heard credible stories of lower paint quality control on the Tesla, including orange peeling, dust nibs, swirl marks, and more susceptibility to chipping. That last one is a particular concern, as a good paint job shouldn’t easily chip.
  • Build quality. The Mach-E feels solid, and well built. Tesla is known for its inconsistent build quality, including panel gaps, loose parts, and water leaks.
  • Novelty. There are Teslas everywhere. I don’t need to be the only one owning my car, but I’m not sure if it would feel as special if every parking lot I pull into has 10 other cars identical to mine.
  • Dashboard screen behind steering wheel. I just want to see an instrument cluster behind the steering wheel. I don’t like that I have to look to the side to see my speed and range on the Model Y. Plus, the upper left of the Model Y screen just looks unpolished to me. The Mach-E does this much better.
  • Physical controls. The Mach-E has physical controls for adjusting the side mirrors, direction of the climate control, a latch to open the glove box, turn on/off interior lights, and operate the windshield wipers. The Model Y does these through the touchscreen. Who wants to adjust their wipers through a touchscreen.
  • Garage door opener. The Mach-E has a real garage door opener in the visor. I have to pay $350 to get this feature in the Model Y touchscreen, which I’m not about to do. I prefer a real button anyway.
  • Apple CarPlay. Why doesn’t the Tesla have this? It’s just stupid.
  • Long company track record. Ford has been here from the start. Tesla is a newcomer, run by a a guy who seems slightly crazy. Will they be around in 10 years?
Only three reasons for the Mach-E: 1) Style / Appearance (with size trade-off) 2) Price (especially if the rebate is still available) 3) Mach-E model with options you like is available right now and you cannot wait. *Some facts up there are incorrect. [For example: I use my iPhone 13 Pro Max for music, it did take about a week to adjust to the non-braking and looking right for speedometer, etc... MY TAKE: the Ford Mach-E California Route 1 WITH the battery upgrade for only $2500 more was a close comparison., and was very tempting with the federal rebate! I decided to wait the extra few months and get the Model Y Long-Range with Acceleration Upgrade to get 0-60MPH in 4.2 seconds. Adding transparency is that my target EV = Fun and Respectable "Family Vehicle."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ormond and OCJeff