Just a few points before you get to worked up on this:Yes. This post says what I meant, in different words.
I'm not poor, but I am also a long way from rich. Tesla better have a damn good reason why changing paint colors costs 1000 dollars extra. What's that? They need to make more profits on the 3 to stay in business? Not my problem. They announced it as a $35,000 car a year and a half ago, they should have tried harder to cut costs.
Tesla offering one crappy color and charging ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS to change it, on the "less expensive" model is very manipulative, deceitful, and unethical. That's not the type of thing they want automotive magazines writing about and being announced on the news and internet.
The only thing we know to day about the paint on Model 3 is what we have seen on the RC cars. This colors that the RC cars have had - witch is the same colors that Model S/X have - we can be pretty sure that will be offered on the Model 3. But we do not yet know:
- - Will their be even more colors? It will make sense to offer more colors on a mass-produced car then a more limited production car like the model S or X. And it will make sense to offer more non-metallic paint options on this lower priced car then on the more "premium" models.
- - What will be the price for an upgraded paint? It will make sense to not charge any more for any non-metallic paints, but if metallic is what you want, it make sense to charge some extra for that. But for a smaller car witch will need less paint it will also make sense to charge less the on the bigger models. It also make sense to have a lower margin on the paint option on a lower cost car then on the "premium" models.
And btw: I will also prefer to have a none-cost paint alternative, but I do understand that it is unrealistic if I also want it to be metallic or multi-coat.