Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Here's why the 3 isn't a mainstream "affordable" car

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Please show us where Elon/Tesla said "mass market affordable car"? I'll be here waiting.

Well, actually the Tesla Secret Master Plan does in fact say:

  1. Build sports car
  2. Use that money to build an affordable car

However, the affordable car they are referring to is the Model S. The Model 3 is "even more affordable", so affordable ls obviously all relative. But the Model 3 was clearly never intended to compete with the Camry's of the world. Tesla has been very clear that they intended it to compete with BMW and Audi. Anybody who expected anything different hasn't been paying attention.
 
I don't agree - Tesla is trying to take market share from people who normally wouldn't have purchased an electric car by making it "affordable". People want the cool tesla factor and for right now think they can get that for 35k
If you listen to the reveal video for the Model 3, or a recent Tesla investor call, Musk references cars in the entry luxury class. Audi A4, Mercedes Benz C300, and BMW. I don't think it's intended to compete with the venerable Camry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlatSix911
First:
Mass market does not mean affordable and affordable does not mean mass market.

Second:
As of July 2017 the average sale price of a new vehicle was $34,721.
Average sale price for an EV is $37,976
Average sale price for an entry level luxury car is $41,989

Assuming a normal distribution, these prices mean that half the sales are greater than this and half the sales are below this. Half the people in the market for a new vehicle can afford a Model 3.

New-Car Transaction Prices Rise Nearly 2 Percent Year-Over-Year in July 2017, According To Kelley Blue Book
 
First:
Mass market does not mean affordable and affordable does not mean mass market.

Second:
As of July 2017 the average sale price of a new vehicle was $34,721.
Average sale price for an EV is $37,976
Average sale price for an entry level luxury car is $41,989

Assuming a normal distribution, these prices mean that half the sales are greater than this and half the sales are below this. Half the people in the market for a new vehicle can afford a Model 3.

New-Car Transaction Prices Rise Nearly 2 Percent Year-Over-Year in July 2017, According To Kelley Blue Book
With one big caveat: the ASP includes SUVs and trucks.
I've looked for sedan ASP before and IIRC $23 - 25k is mid range. OTOH, a large swath of the Accord/Camry market buy more expensive trims and pay close to $30k so the better question here is whether the base Model 3 includes the extras that this group is willing to pay for.

My take: the base Model is within striking distance of the Accord/Camry if fueling is from PV and the car ends up having Honda/Toyota level reliability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: insaneoctane
Total MSRP

Base MSRP

CAMRY XSE V6

$40,994 $34,950

Color

Exterior: Interior:

Midnight Black Metallic / Wind Chill Pearl Black Perforated Leather

$0

$0 $0

Standard Equipment

$0

Packages

Driver Assist Package: Navigation Package:

$1,990

$1,050 $940

Accessories

Phone Cable & Charge Package with Two USB Ports Door Sill Protector w/Front Door Illumination
Carpet Mats w/ Trunk Mat
Mudguards

Clear Paint Protection - Full Hood Package Wheel Locks
TOYOGUARD Platinum
Special Color

Two-Tone Body Color;

$3,164

$189
$299
$399
$199
$419
$65
$699
$395
$500
Delivery, Process, and Handling Fee

Total MSRP

$890

$40,994
There you have it. Camry MSRP ends out at $40,994 including $895 for special paint (two upcharges totaled).
There is lots one does not get that is on the M3.
Even though the vehicles are not even remotely comparable the Camry and the Model 3 are in the same ballpark.
I think the OP has not actually priced a new car considering the options one would choose. People are constantly amazed that they never buy anything at the base price.
 
With one big caveat: the ASP includes SUVs and trucks.
True (which is why I said vehicle instead of car), but the entry level luxury car ASP at $41,989 does not include trucks or CUV/SUVs.

a large swath of the Accord/Camry market buy more expensive trims and pay close to $30k so the better question here is whether the base Model 3
Exactly, the Camry V6 XLE starts at $34,400 They even have some colors that you can't even buy without upgrading to the driver assistance package. You have to add that package if you want navigation so now you're up to $36,390 (for a Camry no less)
 
Tesla was right when they said the model S is far superior. You are better off getting a used model S from the prices I've seen. I also cannot believe the loaded base model of the 3 is 59k. That is absurd
t4131.gif
~500K absurd reservationists are sure you will be better off with your 'new' used Model S!
 
The only issue I have are with the options pricing. IMO, some of them are priced high (especially the LR battery). However; overall, I've come to admit that 35K is an excellent price point for the M3. And many people who ordered early will get all or a portion of the federal credit. And if not, they will most likely be eligible for credits/rebates in their prospective states. I'm in NJ and I'll save close to 4K just in not having to pay taxes. Try getting that for an ICE vehicle.
 
"mainstream" and "affordable" are two pretty different adjectives.

Any car that sells more than 50-75K units a year over the long term is fairly mainstream. The Model 3 should be, the BMW 3-series is fairly mainstream. I'd say if it sells more than 100K units a year it's pretty definable mass-market as well, and not that many individual car models sell in that volume.

Affordable in today's vernacular is usually more associated with folks at or often below the median. Affordable housing, affordable healthcare, etc. I'd use it if folks can purchase something without major consideration or strain on their existing budget, that's affordable. If they have to make some significant lifestyle choices or tradeoffs, that's not really affordable. Some Model S owners have discussed in these forums making some choices that enabled them to own a car 2-3X what they've purchased in the past - yes they can buy the car, affordable is not the term I'd use. A $35K base car, with a median selling price that's likely closer to $42K even in 2018 or 2019, is well-above the current $34K median purchase, and even that being the median is hardly the example of affordable.

I think Tesla targeted and created a mainstream car. I don't think they were really targeting "affordable", though I don't remember if they used that term or not.
 
Can you imagine Toyota charging 1,000 for any other Camry paint than black?

35k is now 36k

Even with a gov credit that car is now 27,500 7,000 more than a 2017 Camry SE on clearance

Most people will not get this credit

But what about the wheels? If you want anything other than the lame aero wheels its now 37,500?

So 35k is now 37,500. We are getting into a range that is about 10k more than the average US car

But add the roof and base auto pilot and now we are at near 47k???

Please explain how 47k is a mass market affordable car?

Tesla was right when they said the model S is far superior. You are better off getting a used model S from the prices I've seen. I also cannot believe the loaded base model of the 3 is 59k. That is absurd




Where are you in the theoretical line? Are you an owner/employee? When did you order?

If you're an owner or employee and/or ordered prior to 10:25am ET on 3/31....hop on out of line. Otherwise, whatever............


Also, you know what people usually think when you complain about the price of something.......


If you're factoring in tax incentives into your potential to afford the vehicle, you can't afford the vehicle. The credits/rebates are a "nice to have" after the fact incentive. You still need to buy or finance the vehicle, at full price, up front.
 
The only issue I have are with the options pricing. IMO, some of them are priced high (especially the LR battery). However; overall, I've come to admit that 35K is an excellent price point for the M3.
Right. Infact it is close to what the first Nissan Leafs sold for in 2011.

Anyone who doesn't want all that Model 3 offers, can still get a 160 mile Leaf 2 for $30k - with inexpensive options.

Musk has repeatedly said Model 3 competes with BMW 3 series etc. It is entirely another matter how many of the 3 buyers will actually be in that target market (people who would have bought an entry level premium car). As we have seen with S, not everyone would have bought a large luxury car, if not for S.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJD
Tesla haven't said mainstream.
They've said mass market.
It will be mass market.

The price is too high to be mainstream. It will be a premium car.
Tesla has said that they will stick to the premium segment.

I think that you are misunderstanding what "mass market" means. It means that it is marketed broadly to the population, rather than being targeted at a narrow group. The fact that many people won't be able to afford it, doesn't stop it being mass market.

It is actually an affordable car in the sense of the new car market. The whole new vehicle market excludes a large proportion of the population and has average prices now comfortably in the $30ks. So the price of the car is actually not that large in the context of the new car market. They've never said it's going to be cheap.
 
Last edited:
I didn't say it was better. I said it is what most Americans deem affordable and mass market at 20k



That's what makes America (and in fairness to our global neighbors.......ANY free market economy) great. Can't afford it? Buy something you can. (or overleverage your credit until you can't afford your lifestyle anymore.....). OR.....work hard, save up, and get what you want. If you feel the Model 3 is no longer the value you were hoping it would be, you can take that money elsewhere.