RogerHScott
Active Member
Unlike every other kind of insurance?gap insurance is priced so they make money
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlike every other kind of insurance?gap insurance is priced so they make money
I don't buy individual muni bonds -- I buy shares in bond funds. Fav: VWLTX.It also taxes a 5 year term to get 2%. You're going to have to go 10 years to get 3 or more and that means you've tied up that money for a long time for a low rate.
Leasing is just buying with an offer to sell back at a given price at the end of the term, or finish buying it if you prefer. There's a little bit of extra complexity on top but that's the basic arrangement.
So I leased. And now, reading this, I'm wondering if I made the wrong decision.
Most do. I've seen both. People sometimes use leases to hedge what they will have to spend, then figure out they want to keep the car after all since they know the history.I'd never thought of it in that way since I just assumed most people give the car up at the end of the lease. But now that you clarify it as such, I feel a bit better about it. Thanks!
I agree, that's close. It's really taking 2 loans. The first loan is to be paid off completely and it is for the the depreciation of the car (a.k.a. capital cost = price - residual). The second loan is on the residual and it's interest only. A lease with $0 residual is practically a loan, though you have to check additional terms to be sure there are no gotchas (read on about Tesla leasing terms). There is also the small tax issue, since on lease you pay taxes on interest vs. loan you pay interest on taxes, but if your taxes stay the same, it's a wash (if sales tax goes up, lease costs more, if sales tax goes down during your lease, lease pays less taxes).Leasing is just buying with an offer to sell back at a given price at the end of the term, or finish buying it if you prefer. There's a little bit of extra complexity on top but that's the basic arrangement.
Its amazing to me how at least half of you guys paid cash.
I am shocked to learn that so many people financed/purchased their Teslas. I have been under the impression for several years that a very high percentage of cars around the $100K mark and above were lease vehicles.
I have always paid cash for or financed my vehicles except for a BMW I leased 15 years ago and a Prius I leased 10 years ago. I hated the process of paying every month for that BMW. And I hated the process of paying every month for that Prius (but not as much as I hated the Prius itself which is why I bought it off the lease program within months of getting it and sold it). I didn't think I'd ever lease a car again, but...
I chose to lease my P100D for several reasons.
I bought a Fisker Karma back in 2012 when the car was introduced and got stuck with an orphan car. It required probably around $35K worth of unanticipated outlay on my part because Fisker went silent for about a year before they eventually declared bankruptcy. Even though I think it *extremely* unlikely anything like that will happen to Tesla at this point, the company isn't established enough for me to want to take that particular risk again, so that put one point in the leasing column.
The thought of writing a check for $150K made me a little nauseated, so that put another point in the leasing column.
But the most important reason I chose to lease was that I was afraid that after 3 years Tesla or another automaker would have produced an EV capable of getting 400 or even 500 miles on a single charge and I would be stuck holding a car with around a 275-300 mile range which would look extremely unattractive as a used car. So that put another point in the leasing column.
So I leased. And now, reading this, I'm wondering if I made the wrong decision.
No used P100D for you?I bought mine used. So i wasn't near the $100k mark.
Lol. I wish. In a 2013 MS 85 now. Hopefully P100D soon!No used P100D for you?
I agree, that's close. It's really taking 2 loans. The first loan is to be paid off completely and it is for the the depreciation of the car (a.k.a. capital cost = price - residual). The second loan is on the residual and it's interest only. A lease with $0 residual is practically a loan, though you have to check additional terms to be sure there are no gotchas (read on about Tesla leasing terms). There is also the small tax issue, since on lease you pay taxes on interest vs. loan you pay interest on taxes, but if your taxes stay the same, it's a wash (if sales tax goes up, lease costs more, if sales tax goes down during your lease, lease pays less taxes).
I've done both leases and loans in my history of getting cars, including one time a lease with $350 residual because the lease interest rate was lower than the loan. Believe me, it confused the hell out of the sales guy why I wanted such a low $350 residual. The finance guy understood once I had him calculate the loan vs. lease payments.
Current Tesla lease terms seem rather disadvantageous as compared to loans. First, the lease interest rate is much higher (e.g. 4.23% vs. 1.74% for well qualified buyers). That in itself adds potentially thousands of dollars in interest in the 3 year period. The terms also prevent you from paying down too much, which means you pay even more interest at the higher interest amounts. Lastly, the 7,500 federal credit is simply added to the residual, not subtracted from the price. So even though your capital cost is the same, the residual is higher to right off you pay about $950 in interest on that $7,500 over 3 years. Then, if you were to buy the car, you have to actually pay the $7,500 since it's added to the residual price. Lease definitely is convenient, but you do pay extra for the convenience of lower payment and not having to worry about selling the car.
I have neighbors who bought houses before 2008 crash, they are still under-water renting their homes hoping the market and/or inflation will catch up so they can sell and get out. It turned out that houses fell in 2008, but then again in 2010 after all the foreclosures kicked in from people who just walked away. Some have dropped to under 60% of peak value. I had one neighbor who bought at the peek, both lawyers, one day just packed up and left - bank foreclosed maybe 6-9 months later and sold at ~60% of peak value. Today the market is going up, but still not reaching the peak pre-crash values (still about 75%-80% of the peak prices, and that's >8 years later - at least people who bought after the first drop are even now).lol @ real estate being "safe". People forget the bubble. Some places still haven't recovered from the bubble.