TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

How Does Bloomberg's Cory Johnson get Away with Being so Anti-Tesla?

Discussion in 'TSLA Investor Discussions' started by mdevp, Nov 3, 2015.

  1. mdevp

    mdevp Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    454
    Location:
    nj
  2. jbdoom

    jbdoom Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2015
    Messages:
    12
    Location:
    NYC
    the same way any news channel gets away with not being objective. bloomberg isn't that much different then say the folks on CNBC..
     
  3. McMuggets

    McMuggets Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    417
    Location:
    Calgary
    Cory Johnson also tweets his Tesla hate all the time. Over time you see the history he has with Tesla and you start seeing a systematic pattern. He also uses his words to make things sound worse than they are. Consider it a gift that allows you to purchase shares for a lower price.
     
  4. Johan

    Johan Took a TSLA bear test. Came back negative.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,890
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    "News" networks only exist anymore to fill the time in between commercials with "content" or are tools by which to effect and shape public thinking (Fox news) by political entities (by this I mean special interest, the only real political force in the US).
     
  5. tftf

    tftf Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2013
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Hop Sing Laundry
    Well, whatever you think of him, two of his latest TSLA tweets have been spot on imho:

    Cory Johnson on Twitter:

    Cory Johnson on Twitter:

    How can any serious analyst keep lowering EPS etc. for months without adjusting price targets?

    And if PTs were touched, there were only cosmetic adjustments.
     
  6. Johan

    Johan Took a TSLA bear test. Came back negative.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,890
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    Uhm, because valuation of a stock is about more than a myopic view on short term earnings (next quarter)? But in your world I suppose investing to grow = burning cash (implied that could have been extracted from the business to create the holy grail of positive EPS).
     
  7. mkjayakumar

    mkjayakumar Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,739
    Location:
    Plano, TX
    TFTF and others bears pretend as if they don't understand some basic things like:

    - spending for infrastructure for growth is the right thing to do for an young company like Tesla. So keep parroting that Tesla will be bankrupt in two quarters might be a great click bait, but investors - as you can see the run today - are rightly ignoring that nonsense.

    - and every move and every EV that is announced or even imagined by any automaker does not automatically become a Tesla killer.

    That is why the likes of TFTF, Anton W, LT, Cory J and others bears are now a laughing stock.

    Nothing wrong in pointing out the stock is overvalued - and I think it is. But the reasons you guys are repeating over and over again just doesn't cut it

    Not that they are ignorant, just being disingenuous and hoping you will pull some longs alone with you.
     
  8. electracity

    electracity Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2015
    Messages:
    1,797
    Location:
    60606
    If you think Tesla is overvalued, you are a bear.
     
  9. tftf

    tftf Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2013
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Hop Sing Laundry
    #9 tftf, Nov 4, 2015
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2015
    Where did I write TSLA will go bankrupt in two quarters?

    They won't as long as Wall Street provides them with new money (either more dilution or more debt, I doubt it's much of the latter going forward since they already securitized assets in mid-2015).

    Tesla will need a lot of fresh money in 2016 imho to keep burning cash (or "investing heavily in the future", if you prefer a bullish term).

    As soon as the heavy Model X cap-ex rounds are over, a lot of Model 3 R&D and then tooling will kick in by 2016-2018.

    There is no free lunch in the car industry, it's constant heavy cap-ex, especially if TSLA wants to keep growing in the double digits.

    Also note that Tesla only spent 10-20% (of the entire $2 bn raised in early 2014) on the actual GF project in Nevada (and the rest of that money is already gone, Tesla already raised new money in mid-2015). They will also need to raise more money to get to full GF output levels announced for 2020. Remember that cell production in the GF will only start in late 2016 (stationary cells) or 2017 (EV cells), that's the cap-ex intensive process. And knowing Tesla, these dates could very well slip again...

    - - - Updated - - -

    It's not about one quarter. It's about many quarters in 2014 and 2015.
     
  10. austinEV

    austinEV Active Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Messages:
    2,490
    Location:
    Austin
    Even if you are right, so what? They are profitable on an operating basis. Do you accept the basic fact that if they stopped all investment in charging network, new models, new factory capacity they would be very profitable? They don't do that, and shouldn't, because they are building for future growth.

    They are supposed to be spending the capital raised on this investment. If you want to argue it has been squandered, do that. They are not spending it on bonuses and CEO pay. The worst you can say, and here you can fill in the bear case, is that they spent too much on charger/service center infrastructure or the model X. That is your argument, explain that to us. But to just say they raised money and spent it is falling on deaf ears.

    The GF money we care about most in the next few quarters comes from Panasonic anyway. So if you want to argue that Panasonic doesn't have the money to build out the equipment inside the building, or cannot raise it lets hear that.

    If they are in fact squandering raised money on the *wrong* investments, then I would expect that the secondary underwriters would have harsh questions about that. Until that happens I expect the answers are good. The money being spent is on valuable investments, but maybe not the expected columns as you suggest. so what?

    Sure they will raise capital and continue to do so. SO WHAT? Explain why investing other people's money in factories and other capacity is a bad thing?
     
  11. Johan

    Johan Took a TSLA bear test. Came back negative.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,890
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    I don't want to get too philosophical but let's take a much more basic view: Here's world GDP in the last centuries:

    30f7fd9ace53e02ecc1e408c3dd75f54.jpg

    How was all this wealth created? Quite a bit from population increase but most of it from real economic growth, that in turn is made possible by development of new and better technology and the steady and aggressive deployment of most of the wealth created in further growth, the latter in bullish terms known as investments.
     
  12. Familial Rhino

    Familial Rhino Endangerous Herbivore

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,053
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    And I, for one, think it's about many quarters in 2017 and beyond.

    Really, that's all this argument is about. Will they make it through the next few years while they invest (you say "burn") cash like crazy to build the foundations for future growth? You seem to argue they won't, or even if they will, they will wake up to a world full of electric BMWs and Chevy Bolts in which Tesla won't be able to maintain margins. Whereas many of us think they will make it, that the world is a big enough place for all competent EV manufacturers, old or young, and that Tesla can maintain their margins because they will continue to out-innovate the competition.
     
  13. McMuggets

    McMuggets Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    417
    Location:
    Calgary

    Fully agree with your comments here. People like Cory Johnson completely forget or discount the network of charging stations and the Gigafactory build as if these are worth $0. Tesla is trading their cash profits and them some for actual infrastructure and hard-assets, that would only cost more later on to build. Whenever I hear "Tesla is losing X dollars per car sold", it just goes to show media catch-phrases trump actual journalism in this day and age. I wonder how profitable any other car company would be if they were in charge of building and maintaining their own network of refuelling stations? What if they were also building their own energy factory to make the fuel used in their own cars?

    Another thing that Tesla doubters forget to think about is that Tesla is going to be making more batteries for EV's and storage than the whole world currently produces. When VW moves to electrify their cars, as they've announced, by 2020.... they're going to have a tough time finding batteries arranged and configured in a way that is as reliable and cost-effective as Tesla's batteries. Ditto for any other car manufacturer trying to get into the EV game. Tesla will have lithium mines locked up (two deals signed for huge reserves in Nevada already, more to come likely) as well as the worlds biggest factory to produce these batteries. Even if the Model 3 didn't sell well, I'm sure VW etc. would love to buy some Tesla batteries for their Jetta Electric.
     
  14. AB4EJ

    AB4EJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    585
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Tesla spending on building infrastructure and investing in new plant equipment certainly shouldn't count against them; however, my impression is that their warranty costs must be quite high due to all the motor change-outs and high-end service (although one could argue that the customer good will is more than worth the cost of the service - still, warranty costs are probably still too high).

    What is the bottom line? That Tesla is a risky stock to own? Maybe so; but I also bought a lot of GM stock in the period 1976 - 1986, which all eventually became worthless.
     
  15. Drax7

    Drax7 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Florida
    strongly disagree with your political views , so stop
     
  16. Familial Rhino

    Familial Rhino Endangerous Herbivore

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,053
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    He should stop because you disagree?
     
  17. Drax7

    Drax7 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Florida
    Are you doing your laundry?
     
  18. McMuggets

    McMuggets Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    417
    Location:
    Calgary
    Check page 3 of the follow shareholder letter for Q3 2015:

    http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ABEA-4CW8X0/261108236x0x858516/F50A9FAF-BA73-4263-8E16-DE1FAC0BABDF/Q3_15_Shareholder_Letter.pdf


    Here you will read that warranty reserves are in line with their estimates and they are doing fine with that. As well their service revenue increased to $84M and margins increased to 9%. Basically, warranty and service are a non-issue. Notably, they are selling more of their pre-owned cars than they are adding... thus they have 17% less pre-owned cars to sell now since demand has been so high.
     
  19. Johan

    Johan Took a TSLA bear test. Came back negative.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,890
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    So what's your explanation for CJ's ignorant comments and the fact that he's able to remain a CNBC commentator for years despite his ignorance?
     
  20. Drax7

    Drax7 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Florida
    this not a political forum. don't need to hear your distortions.
     

Share This Page