Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!

How is Tesla charging the Panasonic 18650PF at over a 1C rate?

Johan

Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!
Feb 9, 2012
7,467
9,510
Drammen, Norway
One owner said the car reported 123 kW initially. This was at Vinje, the very recently opened SC in Norway (latest generation).
 

Muzzman1

Member
Feb 8, 2014
553
775
Los Angeles
It can't be less. The entire battery pack contains 85 kWh of energy. So an 85 kW Supercharger would fill an empty pack in one hour. Which is 1C.

135 kW of power would charge it at 135/85= 1.6C

EDIT : The info Posted Below this line looks to be totally wrong...sorry for the misinformation.....move on past this post.... :)

I am probably mistaken and have no clue what I'm talking about, but I thought that the "C" indicated the maximum discharge/charge rate for the pack. So say, on my S85 when I floor it, the inverter demands about 270Kwh from the pack. Let's just say that is the actual max discharge rate for the pack (it's probably MUCH more). That means that the 135kw SC is only charging at about .5C.

I swear I read this on the forum at some point.....then again.....I might have misunderstood/imagined it....
 

ItsNotAboutTheMoney

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2012
10,253
7,363
Maine
I am probably mistaken and have no clue what I'm talking about, but I thought that the "C" indicated the maximum discharge/charge rate for the pack. So say, on my S85 when I floor it, the inverter demands about 270Kwh from the pack. Let's just say that is the actual max discharge rate for the pack (it's probably MUCH more). That means that the 135kw SC is only charging at about .5C.

I swear I read this on the forum at some point.....then again.....I might have misunderstood/imagined it....

Yes, you misunderstood. 1C = the rate/power at which the pack is discharged/charged in 1 hour.

Battery charger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Cosmacelf

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
8,305
19,624
San Diego
I am probably mistaken and have no clue what I'm talking about, but I thought that the "C" indicated the maximum discharge/charge rate for the pack. So say, on my S85 when I floor it, the inverter demands about 270Kwh from the pack. Let's just say that is the actual max discharge rate for the pack (it's probably MUCH more). That means that the 135kw SC is only charging at about .5C.

I swear I read this on the forum at some point.....then again.....I might have misunderstood/imagined it....

You are confusing kWh and kW. When you floor your Model S, it uses 270 kW of instantaneous power. If you could continue to draw that amount of power, the pack, which has 85 kWh of energy, would be depleted in about 85/270*60= 19 minutes. Which is a 60/19= approx. 3C discharge rate. Which, by the way, the Model S battery can only sustain for brief periods of time before the car's computer will limit power output due to battery over heating issues.

C doesn't indicate max. discharge/charge rate. Spec sheets tell you that. C indicates the rate at which the battery is charging or discharging relative to its maximum energy storage.
 

brianman

Burrito Founder
Nov 10, 2011
17,515
2,980
If you could continue to draw that amount of power, the pack, which has 85 kWh of energy, would be depleted in about 85/270*60= 19 minutes. Which is a 60/19= approx. 3C discharge rate. Which, by the way, the Model S battery can only sustain for brief periods of time before the car's computer will limit power output due to battery over heating issues.
My understanding is that this is a popular theory not substained fact. Perhaps you have some newer information you could link to? Thanks!


Running with that theory a bit, the acceleration limiter on my P85 puts a hard line at 160 kWh.
(Acceleration limiter, some charts from Pacific Raceways)

Limited @ 160 kW
60/(85/160*60)=1.88C ?

Full @ ~348 kW (local maximum in my data)
60/(85/348*60)=4.09C ?
 
Last edited:

David99

Active Member
Jan 31, 2014
4,850
7,021
Brea, Orange County
My understanding is that this is a popular theory not substained fact. Perhaps you have some newer information you could link to? Thanks!

It is basic knowledge about battery management. If you discharge a battery at such a high rate you are going to run into trouble pretty quick. The losses in the battery itself and the entire electrical drive train is substantial. At normal driving the losses are 10%. Double the power and you quadruple the ohmic losses. Drawing 200-300 kW out of the battery will probably have total losses around 50 kW or more. The Model S is clearly not designed to handle that much cooling and will limit the power. Also the voltage in the cells will drop below a healthy level and cause permanent damage. It's fine do do it for short periods of time like it is common in normal driving. But honestly I can' think of a situation, other than a large circular race track that allows full throttle 100% of the time, where you could possibly run the car at full load for a extended time.

Yes some electric powered remote cars and helicopters discharge at that rate but they don't come with an 8 year warranty and those batteries die within a few months when used that way on a daily basis.
 

Johan

Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!
Feb 9, 2012
7,467
9,510
Drammen, Norway
It is basic knowledge about battery management. If you discharge a battery at such a high rate you are going to run into trouble pretty quick. The losses in the battery itself and the entire electrical drive train is substantial. At normal driving the losses are 10%. Double the power and you quadruple the ohmic losses. Drawing 200-300 kW out of the battery will probably have total losses around 50 kW or more. The Model S is clearly not designed to handle that much cooling and will limit the power. Also the voltage in the cells will drop below a healthy level and cause permanent damage. It's fine do do it for short periods of time like it is common in normal driving. But honestly I can' think of a situation, other than a large circular race track that allows full throttle 100% of the time, where you could possibly run the car at full load for a extended time.

Yes some electric powered remote cars and helicopters discharge at that rate but they don't come with an 8 year warranty and those batteries die within a few months when used that way on a daily basis.

Our German fried in this thread Discharging at High Speed (100 mph) drove 180 km at an average speed of 165 km/h which means he must have used slightly over an hour to discharge the battery (just under 1 C on average). He calculates Ohmic losses elegantly, please let me quote him:

Very interesting was the amount of energy I was able to get out of the battery. 0 Typical Range was reached 100m (90yrds) in front of the garage. So the Zero Mile protection as well as the Block Protection were untouched. 71,2 kWh came out of the battery. With these 9 kWh protection the battery just gave 80,2 kWh (instead of 85 kWh).

This is normal, because Peukert's Law says, that higher currents result in more losses. I compared this high speed discharging with a typical discharging of mine at an average of 204 Wh/km (328 Wh/mi). I got more (74,3 kWh) out of the battery during slow discharging. I also calculated the Kapa of the Peukert Function. It resulted in a value between 1.03 and 1.04, which is significantly better than a standard Li-Ion battery (1.05). This shows the high end chemistry of the cells in our cars.

I'm not sure if or how often he got power limited, he doesn't say in his post.

David99 I know you know this (I see your reply in horst's thread) but I thought it would be of interested in this thread to those who haven't seen it.
 

David99

Active Member
Jan 31, 2014
4,850
7,021
Brea, Orange County
Yes, I was replying more to the question about discharging at 4C. That's definitely not possible with the Model S. What Horst was doing is, all things considered, probably more like 0.8 to 0.9 C. That's reasonable.
 

scaesare

Well-Known Member
Mar 14, 2013
8,212
13,071
NoVA
There’s also speculation that the power limit could be to prevent rotor overheating.

Yep... and/or the inverter. Those are the two components with the highest coolant temps noted on some of the diagnostic screens that have been spied...
 

JRP3

Hyperactive Member
Aug 20, 2007
19,484
42,733
Central New York
I would assume that the inverter is the first thing to reach temperature limits since the motor can operate at much higher temperatures than the IGBT's in the inverter. Plus I'd think the highest efficiency losses in the system would be from the power conversion going on in the inverter. Inverter output current should be higher than battery current until the motor reaches base speed, I think.
 

HSPalm

New Member
May 25, 2016
1
0
Drammen, Norway
Actually C is the charge and discharge rating, it does stand for capacity. But if you want to know what for instance 2C charge rate on your cell is you multiply it by your cells capacity (stated in mAh). In your cells datasheet you will find charge rate and discharge rate stated separately in numbers of C.
 

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top