For those wondering where my goal post for EVs actually is, it's at 400 miles in a car with 20 minute recharges. That's 4.5- 5 hours of driving which is about the point where I get bored with life unless I'm being paid for it and I'm in the truck, then I'll roll on for 16 hours at a time I'll stop once to refuel and once to sleep.
I say Alaska because I've been hired to make that trip many times towing RVs up there, although I pass them off at the border. I would like to vacation up there and that's about 550 gallons of diesel in the truck. Even paying for electricity at 15c and 330kh/mi that's 2,800kwh about $1,000 savings and for someone who made $38k last year that would go quite a long ways.
I talk a lot of *sugar* on the forum about Tesla's short comings that people like to overlook and by no means are they close to a car manufacturer, more like a boutique tech company in my opinion, but the world of EVs in general is here to stay and that I agree with.
Back to the topic at hand, I'd be content with 150-180mile stops on the drive up but it seems that tesla isn't looking to bridge AK with the 48 for a PR stunt and there's no real demand therefore no hurry to install them. I would say, even if you don't bridge the US it would seem prudent to link the major cities within Alaska to allow travel more easily there. It would also provide for some spectacular cold wheaten testing going up towards the slope.