I voted neutral.
After all the complaining about the User Interface even before the firmware was released, I was relieved that the look, feel and use wasn't worse than it is.
As others have stated I find the reversal of the range meter with the odometer reading to be a definite step backwards. For me the most frequently accessed data is the range. It was correct to have it front and center in a large prominent location, not relegated to a tiny portion off to the bottom left. In fact, I would like the Projected Range from the Energy application added to the dashboard screen. One way to do this would be to add it to the right of the thumbnail version of the Energy screen.
In contrast odometer readings are only infrequently referred to and shouldn't be in such a prominent location.
Like others I appreciate the new lock/unlock icon, but I agree with AmpedRealtor's suggestion that a park button toggle between open and lock would have been more intuitive and easier to use.
I appreciate the larger media buttons in concept, but find that they are not aesthetically balanced with the remainder of the media display.
I found the placement of the date, day, time temperature, and mileage at the bottom of the dashboard display to be vastly more compact and appropriate than an oversized analog clock with only two pieces of information.
All in all, I am merely satisfied, but not impressed with the User Interface changes and hope that 7.1 will be a more thoughtful implementation for the Classic owners.
Larry
PS I am very pleased with the fact that the RWD fleet was thrown a bone by slightly improving the efficiency in version 7.0.