whitex
Well-Known Member
.
Updates can be a great thing - every feature sold should be complete, i.e. the car does everything. Updates only fix bugs and potentially enhance performance. New features can be made available optionally (and possibly for a price) once they are ready, or as beta to people who agree to test it. Using updates like Tesla does only gives them a bad name.
I used to think so, but over time I realized that the way Tesla does it is actually worse. First, Tesla uses this to sell incomplete product which sometimes never completes. Things like selling features which don't work AT ALL for years, selling features which never do what they were advertised to do, or selling features and later saying "oups, we thought we could deliver this, so let us find some fancy wording lawyering so that we can have an excuse to never deliver it"., or "you know, when we say the car will find you anywhere on private property, we meant as long you are along a straight line up to 40 feet ahead or behind the car, sorry we forgot to fine print that". Second string of drawbacks being a test vehicle for Tesla. Someone has some new idea how to manage a battery better, "sure, take few thousands cars and update them to that scheme, two years later batteries didn't fare so well, ok, let's limit the maximum charge of the car, after all we do officially only guarantee 70% of the original battery capacity, but we did learn what not to do and that is very valuable to future customers and Tesla of course". Lost or broken features are a third string of Tesla update side effects. Then there is a fourth one - the software is being written for newer, faster hardware, so it starts lagging on the old hardware forced to update.The ability to update is a blessing and a curse. How many other car companies continue to push free upgrades to customers for years after purchase? Most traditional car dealers will charge you $500 just to update the maps in your GPS system after you drive off the lot.
I’m not a Tesla fanboy in any way, and I think the QA process for their software could certainly improve, but in totality I think the updates and upgrades are more of a benefit than a downfall.
Updates can be a great thing - every feature sold should be complete, i.e. the car does everything. Updates only fix bugs and potentially enhance performance. New features can be made available optionally (and possibly for a price) once they are ready, or as beta to people who agree to test it. Using updates like Tesla does only gives them a bad name.