B
banned-66611
Guest
What's up with this trend of comparing vehicles to older, larger Teslas with less efficient motors? The Tesla to compare a new Kona with is a new Model 3. Full stop. Any other comparison is just silly. It's like comparing a Yaris to an old pickup.
Reason for the comparison is Bjorn owns a Model X P90D. It's not a completely useless comparison though, because the P90D has a range of a little under 300 miles which is the same as the Kona.
Model 3 LR
Yes but the equivalent spec M3 LR+AP costs $20,000 more, so I'd expect it to be a little better. Although I bet in practice if you raced the two over a long distance they would be about the same.
250 EPA miles on 64 usable kWh is 256 Wh/mi
But it depends on so many factors. EPA range is just one measure, WLTP is another, and then there is reality. Bjorn is an expert at getting good range from EVs. He calculates the best speed and charging strategy. His driving skills are well proven.
310 (downrated) EPA miles
220 if we are being fair.
Bjørn has a real soft spot for Hyundais and always has
LOL. Apart from being a Tesla fanboy he was pretty up front about the limitations of the Ioniq.
I couldn't help but slap my forehead watching him talk about how "streamlined" it is, when that car isn't even remotely that streamlined. Exposed door handles, bulbous front end designed to hold an ICE, reduced rear taper, irregular underside, etc, etc, etc. I've seen numbers for the Cd of 0,29 cited, although people might be confusing that with the gasoline Kona. But certainly nothing spectacular. There's a reason his energy consumption went up so much at 120 kph.
And yet he did 510km on one charge... Could it be that exposed door handles don't make much difference after all? Hyundai clearly know what they are doing, the Ioniq long term performance proves that. And at 125kph he was still seeing a solid 220 miles, which is the rated range of the Model 3 SR at considerably lower speeds.
If Hyundai was turning a decent profit on these (or any profit), they'd be making them in far larger volumes. They're not so they clearly don't.
Unlikely. It's all about risk management. New model, new drivetrain, new battery, new software. If you rush out huge numbers there is a risk you will end up fixing huge numbers when some problem is found. So you ramp up a bit more slowly. Nissan made this mistake with the Leaf 40 and rapidgate, and are trying to avoid a recall.
Tesla took a big gamble with the M3, but it seems to be paying off. The problems that plagued the S and X seem to have been mostly resolved and they haven't had anything like the drive unit failures. But they also did a lot to mitigate the risk, e.g. the drive unit is very easy to replace on the M3.