I wish the EPA would display range the same as ICE vehicles, one for CITY and one for HIGHWAY and then combined (average for new EV owners).
Funny for EPA ratings the numbers are reversed, on an ICE the Highway id higher than the City and for an EV the City would be higher than the Highway.
But that 316/326 Tesla displays and advertises is a joke. You'd need to average
Agree, and the EPA and Tesla should show a City, Highway, and Combined (average) range. The 316/326 Tesla advertises is a joke.
The thing that causes the most issues for new EV owners is the fact that with an ICE vehicle they get better fuel mileage at highway speeds, whereas an EV gets worse, so the 316/326 becomes an impossible number to reach.
To get the EPA/Tesla 316/326 range I believe one would need to average about 240 wh/mi, that's barely doable in the city in ideal conditions and impossible at freeway speeds.
From my 2020 LR AWD window sticker
This should be clearly communicated to any NEW EV/Tesla owner. They need to focus on their wh/mi number(s) vs the number of miles the car displays by the battery icon.
And our man Bjorn conducted a pretty conclusive test drive on an LR M3 and came to similar results.