Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Is it the right time to trade up to HW2?

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
You want to upgrade to a hardware suite that, currently, cannot provide comparable capabilities to the previous one? Doesn't make much sense to me. Newer is only better if it performs better. Forget FSD, Enhanced Autopilot hasn't even shipped yet. What HW2 is currently delivering is a poor, dysfunctional version of Gen 1 Autopilot. Personally I would not upgrade to any new Model S until Tesla can show that it actually plans on delivering what it promised.

If you want a new car, then go for it. But I don't think HW2 is any sort of logical justification.

I agree it isn't ideal upgrade time but you're behind the reality if you think AP2 is poor an dysfunctional. Buy one then judge. Til then you have no basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LargeHamCollider
@benflux @oktane hasn't the slightest clue what he's talking about when he makes predictions for the future. Owning both cars I say AP2 is very very close to AP1 in performance right now and is in some ways better (no truck lust ever), handles narrowing roads more reliably in my experience. However no great need to upgrade right now - I'd wait til early 2018 personally.

Don't believe @calisnow, I actually can see into the future. ;) My one piece of advise is do not trust Tesla's claims on future updates and software rollouts. They are usually half-baked attempts significantly behind timelines that do not live up to the marketing hype. It would be CRAZY to upgrade to an AP2 car based on expectations that "it will get better with time".

Wait until an AP2 car is definitively better (in the ways that matter to YOU) before considering an upgrade. There is not a single instance right now where I can imagine an AP2 car is better than AP1, other than the refreshed nose-cone (aesthetics) and being shiny/new.
 
I agree it isn't ideal upgrade time but you're behind the reality if you think AP2 is poor an dysfunctional. Buy one then judge. Til then you have no basis.

No, do not "buy one then judge".

Ask Tesla to lend you an AP2 car to test drive for a day, then judge, and buy based ONLY on what the car can currently do. If you think it is better than AP1 (and you won't) then buy the car.

Not knowing Tesla's troubled history with broken promises and believing the hype, "buy then judge" is what I did. My decision to purchase was based on Tesla's false claims and I regret being suckered by them.
 
Just my opinion, HW2 hasn't proven itself after 9months, so too early to jump ship from AP1. Those not on any AP hardware, I can see the point in upgrading. But for me, I would wait for a dramatic change to jump.

My definition of dramatic change would be:

(1) true FSD (hopefully 3-5yrs from now)

(2) drastic reduction in charge time (e.g. 10mins gets us 200 miles - getting close to filling gas experience) - this is also likely 3-5yrs away, just speculations, but hopeful.

For me, any one of the above would be quite compelling to shell out $20-$40K for an upgrade. Likely these two would come around the same time. So it could be double bonanza. Also, pricing could be more competitive by then.

Until then, happy with AP1 for the most boring commute traffic (bumper to bumper) and drive myself for all other conditions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GSP and oktane
I think it is likely that upcoming changes may increase price of the base model so if you care about that it is a good time to upgrade now.

Tesla have promised full self driving capabilities for AP2.0 cars so I would expect them to upgrade anyone for free if new hardware is needed.

Agree that Tesla should upgrade all HW 2 cars for free if necessary for FSD. Disagree they will actually do it. I would bet the farm they won't do it. They'll say whatever they deliver is good enough, first adopters pay, etc etc, then actually deliver FSD with more and different HW if needed.
 
You can't defend that statement because there are some things AP2 does better - as I just mentioned. So to make your statement stick you have to arbitrarily place more value on some things than others. You've moved beyond facts and into ethics. Beware - sticky ground.

As I said, "It is true, of course, that certain streets may be handled better or worse on both sides.".

But I have no problem with us elaborating further. I am aiming for facts and I think those reading the thread deserve them, not some vague (and possibly biased) interpretations of what AP2 is or isn't.

I will make two amended versions of my post to correct:

1) The IMO:

AnxietyRanger said:
Let's be exact: AP2 does not have AP1's object recognition or speed traffic-sign recognition, though. It is still IMO the worse product. It will not be the worse product forever, but still today it is. It is true, of course, that certain streets may be handled better or worse on both sides.

2) The facts:

AnxietyRanger said:
Let's be exact: AP2 does not have AP1's object recognition or speed traffic-sign recognition, though. It is still the worse product when it comes to available features. It will not be the worse product forever, but still today it is. It is true, of course, that certain streets may be handled better or worse on both sides.

On those available features:

Compared to AP1 cars, AP2 cars lack traffic sign detection and compliance, they lack adjacent lane object display, they lack object detection/identification on the instrument cluster, they probably lack pedestrian detection or at least identification, and they lack auto windshield wipers. There are also very likely other deficiencies in AP2's overall capability compared to the underlying MobilEye in AP1, simply given the lesser development time.

They only real, possible benefit on AP1 vs. AP2 at this time, that I can see, is that they have are practical differences in autosteer performance, which can swing to both ways. The performance of AP2 has not been constant either, given the recent history, so we don't quite know how it will go from here. AP1 is more of a known quantity.

And, of course, the most important difference: AP2 has future upgrade potential that AP1 does not have. However, for OP, the same can be said of any future Tesla purchase. The longer he waits, the more likely he will get even more future upgrade potential than by buying today - or at the very least, the same.
 
  • Helpful
  • Like
Reactions: GSP and calisnow
I wouldn't switch till AP hardware has a rear facing radar that can prevent a collision on lane changes, and even better provide real blind spot side assist.

While I'm all for rear radars (and we know Tesla was planning/testing them too back in ~2015), AP2 does have the side cameras that can see backwards. They should be able to handle many lane change scenarios, though they can not see through a car like radar can.

AP2 does not yet use those backwards looking side cameras for anything (other than taking debug images), so they are still more theoretical...
 
While I'm all for rear radars (and we know Tesla was planning/testing them too back in ~2015), AP2 does have the side cameras that can see backwards. They should be able to handle many lane change scenarios, though they can not see through a car like radar can.

Personally I think cameras are the better approach here. Regardless of whether or not rear side radar sees something, you still need to make the determination of whether it's in a lane of interest or not. That's inevitably going to be done through camera, and anything not visible to the side repeater camera / backup camera is probably not going to be a significant factor in the decision to change lanes.

But yeah, I wish they'd activate more cameras already!
 
Personally I think cameras are the better approach here. Regardless of whether or not rear side radar sees something, you still need to make the determination of whether it's in a lane of interest or not. That's inevitably going to be done through camera, and anything not visible to the side repeater camera / backup camera is probably not going to be a significant factor in the decision to change lanes.

But yeah, I wish they'd activate more cameras already!

I still think both would be best.

Radar could be useful in a curve, where seeing through a trailing car - e.g. a fast approaching car behind it - could be useful. If radar gives a hit, the car could decide to wait.

Same with rear-collision warning and reacting to situations where a car is approaching the trailing car from behind it. A camera can't see an object approaching too fast behind a trailing car, radar can. Radar is useful in the front, it would very well be useful in the back too.
 
No, do not "buy one then judge".

Ask Tesla to lend you an AP2 car to test drive for a day, then judge, and buy based ONLY on what the car can currently do. If you think it is better than AP1 (and you won't) then buy the car.

Not knowing Tesla's troubled history with broken promises and believing the hype, "buy then judge" is what I did. My decision to purchase was based on Tesla's false claims and I regret being suckered by them.

:). Add me to the list. I got the delivery of the AP1 car just days before Musk announced AP2 cars, and my car's future AP feature upgradability possibility took a nose dive. My good luck that AP1 is doing most of what Level2 autonomy would provide (not all the promises Telsa made, but most of what L2 would do), so I turned out to be lucky, and happy. Many with AP2 haven't got what was promised to be available a while ago, and IFF, Tesla announces HW3 in Oct this/next year (say with just 4 more radars - one on each corner of the car - just a theory/guess), suddenly AP2 owners would not get what was promised to them (full FSD). And the saga would continue.

I fully agree with the notion that buy what you can see and feel today and whether you are happy with that, not rely on promise. More than AP future, I am personally more interested in battery technology enhancements which most likely cannot be s/w upgradeable. I am keeping my money until a significant battery technology upgrade happens (10mins charge to get 200miles).

Just my 2 cents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oktane
IFF, Tesla announces HW3 in Oct this/next year (say with just 4 more radars - one on each corner of the car - just a theory/guess), suddenly AP2 owners would not get what was promised to them (full FSD). And the saga would continue.

I think AP2 is probably going to be different from AP1 story in the sense that AP2 probably will continue getting significant updates even after the guaranteed AP3 ships (or AP2.5 in Model 3...). The nature of the AP2 beast is just that different and any AP3 is very likely to be based on the same system, so AP2 would just continue as a subset of AP3... Now, full FSD was and is iffy, of course.

But given someone looking at upgrading... stick with AP1 for now is my recommendation. If AP3 comes tomorrow (or AP 2.5 which actually literally might come tomorrow), you would have rushed the upgrade to AP2 sort of in vain... you wouldn't get any benefit from AP2 vs. AP3, and for a while you might even be worse off than with AP1 you were...

Wait.
 
  • Helpful
  • Like
Reactions: GSP and phaduman
I should've said "drive then judge" and I only meant it wrt the claim that's it's "poor and dysfunctional." I agree no point in upgrading from an AP1 car right now. If you do not even own a Tesla however I'd buy AP2 without thinking twice.

No, do not "buy one then judge".

Ask Tesla to lend you an AP2 car to test drive for a day, then judge, and buy based ONLY on what the car can currently do. If you think it is better than AP1 (and you won't) then buy the car.

Not knowing Tesla's troubled history with broken promises and believing the hype, "buy then judge" is what I did. My decision to purchase was based on Tesla's false claims and I regret being suckered by them.
s
 
You can't defend that statement because there are some things AP2 does better - as I just mentioned. So to make your statement stick you have to arbitrarily place more value on some things than others. You've moved beyond facts and into ethics. Beware - sticky ground.

As I said, "It is true, of course, that certain streets may be handled better or worse on both sides.".

But I have no problem with us elaborating further. I am aiming for facts and I think those reading the thread deserve them, not some vague (and possibly biased) interpretations of what AP2 is or isn't.

Interesting reports by the way again:

2017.28 c528869

Severe lane hugging...

E.g. these comparisons of AP1 vs. AP2:

I will share an experience today I had with the version in an AP2 loaner, and my AP1 car (that had older version and didn't update until later when I got home).

- Drove to SC today for recall/FWD fix in my AP1 X. In right lane and it drove centered and well in area under bridge before an exit I take.
- Drove again back to SC in AP2 loaner (a nice P100D which was cool) and it severely hugged the right line and went over it some, even when car in front of me was centered, and with a wall to the right which made me keep hold of it the whole time.

Definitely some differences in the two hardware implementations and software still, maybe calibration some, etc. For you guys with AP2 hopefully it is well improved here soon, felt your pain briefly.

Similar experience, see above. AP1 MX at SC while I was driving MS AP2 loaner with most current software. Severe ping ponging in lanes, jerks with acceleration and deceleration (gave me a little whiplash). I was actually scared to use it after about 10 minutes. It also asks to hold the steering wheel way way more than my AP1. Truthfully, if I had an AP2 car at this point I'd be pissed.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: GSP